首页> 外文期刊>Journal of modern manufacturing technology >A Comparison between PSO and GA Approach for Energy and Cost Effective Saas Placement on Cloud
【24h】

A Comparison between PSO and GA Approach for Energy and Cost Effective Saas Placement on Cloud

机译:PSO与GA方法对云中能源和成本效益SaaS安置的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Software as a Service (SaaS) is a way of delivering applications over the Internet as a service. SaaS applications are sometimes called Web-based software, on-demand software, or hosted software. It is the very important services in cloud computing. The challenges in Saas placement problem depends resource requirements, cloud network size and communication among its components. This paper is a comparative study of two saas placement algorithms, the aim is to finds energy efficient cost effective solution for Saas Placement Problem (SPP). In this work, it find optimal Saas placement in Cloud based on service level agreement (SLA). Particle Swarm Optimization(PSO) and Genetic Algorithm (GA) that have been applied to find the optimal placement of Saas component and find which algorithm approach minimize the total cost incurred to the Saas provider and minimize the total energy. Virtual machine placement approaches to the virtual machine placement problem consider the energy consumption by physical machines in a data center. Experimental results show that energy efficient Saas Placement using PSO generates better solutions than Saas Placement using GA.
机译:作为服务(SaaS)的软件是一种通过Internet将应用程序作为服务提供的方式。 SaaS应用程序有时称为基于Web的软件,按需软件或托管软件。它是云计算中非常重要的服务。 SaaS放置问题的挑战取决于其组件中的资源需求,云网络大小和通信。本文是对两个SAAS放置算法的比较研究,目的是为SaaS放置问题找到节能性能有效的解决方案(SPP)。在这项工作中,它在基于服务级别协议(SLA)的云中找到了最佳的SaaS放置。粒子群优化(PSO)和遗传算法(GA)已应用,以查找SaaS组件的最佳位置,并找到哪种算法方法最小化SaaS提供商的总成本,并最大限度地减少总能量。虚拟机放置问题的虚拟机展示位置问题考虑数据中心的物理机器的能量消耗。实验结果表明,使用PSO的节能SaaS放置比使用GA的SaaS展示位置更好的解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号