首页> 外文期刊>American journal of dentistry >In vitro comparison of bonding effectiveness of different adhesive strategies
【24h】

In vitro comparison of bonding effectiveness of different adhesive strategies

机译:不同胶粘剂策略的胶合效果的体外比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To compare the bond strength to human dentin for a variety of adhesive materials, including self-adhesive resin composites, self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems and glass-ionomer cement by means of micro shear bond strength (mu SBS) test and SEM observations. Methods: Seventy-two human molars were sectioned to obtain a 2 mm-thick slab of mid-coronal dentin and were subsequently randomly divided into nine groups (n= 8). Nine conical frustum-shaped build-ups were constructed on the occlusal surface of each dentin slab using bonding agents (Group 1: OptiBond FL; Group 2: OptiBond XTR) combined with a resin composite (Premise Flow), self-adhesive resin composites (Group 3: RelyX Unicem; Group 4: RelyX Unicem 2; Group 5: SmartCem2; Group 6: SpeedCEM; Group 7: Maxcem Elite; Group 8: Vertise Flow) and a glass-ionomer cement (Group 9: Ketac-Fil). Specimens were subjected to mu SBS test and observed with SEM. Data were analyzed by a mixed model and chi-square test. Results: The bond strengths measured in Groups 3-9 were significantly lower than those recorded in Groups 1 and 2. There were no significant differences in bond strengths between Groups 1 and 2 or between Groups 4 through 8. The bond strength measured in Group 9 was significantly lower than those recorded in Groups 4, 5, and 6 but was not significantly different than those recorded in Groups 3, 7, and 8. Failures were mainly adhesive in all groups.
机译:目的:通过微剪切粘结强度(μSBS),比较各种粘结材料与人牙本质的粘结强度,包括自粘结树脂复合材料,自蚀刻和蚀刻漂洗粘结体系以及玻璃离聚物水泥。 )测试和SEM观察。方法:将72颗人类磨牙切成薄片,以获得2毫米厚的中冠状牙本质板,然后将其随机分为9组(n = 8)。使用粘合剂(第1组:OptiBond FL;第2组:OptiBond XTR)与树脂复合材料(Premise Flow),自粘树脂复合材料(第1组:OptiBond FL;第2组:OptiBond XTR)在每个牙本质板的咬合面上构建九个圆锥形的截头圆锥形堆积物。第3组:RelyX Unicem;第4组:RelyX Unicem 2;第5组:SmartCem2;第6组:SpeedCEM;第7组:Maxcem Elite;第8组:Vertise Flow)和玻璃离聚物水泥(第9组:Ketac-Fil)。对样品进行mu SBS测试,并用SEM观察。通过混合模型和卡方检验分析数据。结果:在第3-9组中测得的粘结强度显着低于在第1组和第2组中记录的粘结强度。第1组与第2组之间或第4-8组之间的粘结强度没有显着差异。第9组中测得的粘结强度显着低于第4、5和6组中记录的水平,但与第3、7和8组中记录的水平没有显着差异。所有组中的故障主要是粘附性的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号