首页> 外文期刊>Journal of prosthodontics: official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists >Virtual Evaluation of the Accuracy of Fit and Trueness in Maxillary Poly(etheretherketone) Removable Partial Denture Frameworks Fabricated by Direct and Indirect CAD/CAM Techniques
【24h】

Virtual Evaluation of the Accuracy of Fit and Trueness in Maxillary Poly(etheretherketone) Removable Partial Denture Frameworks Fabricated by Direct and Indirect CAD/CAM Techniques

机译:通过直接和间接CAD / CAM技术制造的上颌骨聚(醚酮)可拆卸的部分义齿框架的适应性和真实性的虚拟评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Purpose To compare the accuracy of fit and trueness of maxillary poly(etheretherketone) (PEEK) removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks fabricated by direct and indirect computer‐aided design/computer‐aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) techniques. Materials and Methods A definitive maxillary class I master epoxy model was duplicated to create a stone cast. The cast was scanned, and an RPD was designed. Standard tessellation language (STL) data were used to fabricate 20 identical RPD frameworks using two CAD/CAM techniques: direct milling of PEEK and indirect additive manufacturing (resin printing combined with PEEK thermopressing using the lost‐wax technique). All the frameworks for each technique (n = 10) and the reference cast were scanned. To assess the accuracy of fit, a color map was constructed using metrology software, and the misfit (distance between each framework and the reference cast) was measured at 25 standardized points. To assess the overall trueness, each framework STL file was superimposed over the original design's STL file, and the average deviation was recorded in microns. Data were statistically analyzed using t ‐test. Results Color mapping showed distinct pressure areas in the anterior and posterior straps of the major connector in the indirect technique, while a more uniform distribution of the color map was observed in the direct technique. A significant difference was found between the two techniques regarding the overall accuracy of fit. Compared with the indirect technique, the milled frameworks showed significantly better overall trueness ( p 0.001). Conclusions Although a significant difference in the overall fit accuracy was noted between both techniques, the fit was an acceptable clinical fit. The fabrication method affects the fit in the anterior and posterior strap areas. The frameworks of the direct technique revealed better overall trueness values compared with the indirect technique.
机译:摘要目的,比较上颌多(醚酮)(PEEK)可拆卸部分义齿(RPD)框架的贴合和真实性的准确性,通过直接和间接的计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD / CAM)技术制造的可拆卸部分义齿(RPD)框架。材料和方法是一种明确的上颌类母母环氧模型被复制,以创造一个石头铸造。扫描铸件,设计了一个RPD。使用两个CAD / CAM技术使用标准曲面图语言(STL)数据来制造20个相同的RPD框架:直接铣削PEEK和间接添加剂制造(使用丢失的蜡技术与PEEK Thermopring结合使用)。扫描了每个技术(n = 10)和参考演员的所有框架。为了评估拟合的准确性,使用计量软件构建彩色图,并且在25个标准化点测量错配(每个框架和参考铸造的距离)。为了评估整体文化,每个框架STL文件都叠加在原始设计的STL文件上,并且平均偏差记录在微米中。使用T -Test进行统计分析数据。结果颜色映射在间接技术中显示了主要连接器的前后和后肩带的不同压力区域,而在直接技术中观察到彩色图的更均匀分布。两种技术与拟合整体准确性的技术之间发现了显着差异。与间接技术相比,研磨的框架显示出明显更好的整体真实性(P <0.001)。结论,尽管在两种技术之间发现了整体拟合精度的显着差异,但其适合是可接受的临床适合。制造方法影响前部和后带区域的配合。与间接技术相比,直接技术的框架揭示了更好的整体特征值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号