首页> 外文期刊>Journal of prosthodontics: official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists >Effect of Two Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness, Topography, and Flexural Strength of a Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic
【24h】

Effect of Two Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness, Topography, and Flexural Strength of a Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic

机译:两种抛光系统对整体锂静态陶瓷表面粗糙度,地形和弯曲强度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose To evaluate the effect of overglazing and two polishing procedures on flexural strength and quality and quantity of surface roughness of a monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic computer-aided design (CAD) after grinding. Materials and Methods This in vitro study was conducted on 52 partially crystalized bar-shaped specimens (16 x 4 x 1.6 mm) of monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic. The specimens were wet polished with 600-, 800-, and 1200-grit silicon carbide papers for 15 seconds using a grinding/polishing machine at a speed of 300 rpm. Then, the specimens were crystalized and glaze-fired in one step simultaneously and randomly divided into four groups of 13: (I) Glazing group (control); (II) Grinding-glazing group, subjected to grinding with red band finishing diamond bur (46 mu m) followed by glazing; (III) Grinding-D+Z group, subjected to grinding and then polishing by coarse, medium, and fine diamond rubber points (D+Z); and (IV) Grinding-OptraFine group, subjected to grinding and then polishing with a two-step diamond rubber polishing system followed by a final polishing step with an OptraFine HP brush and diamond polishing paste. The surface roughness (Ra and Rz) values (mu m) were measured by a profilometer, and the mean values were compared using one-way ANOVA and Tamhane's test (post hoc comparison). One specimen of each group was evaluated under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) for surface topography. The three-point flexural strength values of the bars were measured using a universal testing machine at a 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed and recorded. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tamhane's test (alpha = 0.05). Results Statistically significant differences were noted among the experimental groups for Ra, Rz (p 0.0001), and flexural strength values (p 0.009). The lowest Ra and Rz values were found in the grinding-OptraFine group (0.465 +/- 0.153), which were significantly lower than those in glazing (p 0.03) and grinding-glazing (p 0.001) groups. The Ra and Rz values were not significantly different between the two polishing systems (p = 0.23 and p = 0.25, respectively). The highest flexural strength was found in the glazing group (283.350 +/- 49.854 MPa) without significant differences compared to grinding-glazing (p = 0.98) and grinding-OptraFine groups (p = 0.86). The lowest flexural strength was found in grinding-D+Z group (225.070 +/- 17.299), which was significantly different from the value in glazing (p 0.03) and grinding-glazing (p 0.04) groups. SEM analysis of polished surfaces revealed regular morphology with some striations. Conclusions The OptraFine system created smoother and more uniform surfaces in terms of quantity (p 0.03 for Ra, p 0.01 for Rz) and quality of roughness compared to glazing. The flexural strength of lithium disilicate ceramic after polishing with the OptraFine system was similar to that after glazing (p = 0.86). Despite similar surface roughness after polishing with the two systems, the D+Z system reduced the flexural strength of ceramic (p 0.03).
机译:目的是评估涂覆和两种抛光程序对磨削后整体锂静态陶瓷计算机辅助设计(CAD)的弯曲强度和质量和质量和数量的效果。材料和方法该体外研究在52个部分结晶的条形标本(16×4×1.6mm)的整体锂静止陶瓷上进行。使用磨削/抛光机以300rpm的速度使用研磨/抛光机,用600-,800和1200粒和1200粒碳化硅纸进行湿抛光。然后,将样品结晶并在一步中同时涂抹并随机分为四组13:(I)玻璃组(对照); (ii)研磨玻璃玻璃,经过红色乐队精加工金刚石Bur(46 mu m),然后玻璃磨削; (iii)研磨-d + Z组,经过粗,培养基和细金刚石橡胶点(D + Z)研磨,然后抛光。和(iv)研磨 - Optrafine组,进行研磨然后用两步金刚石橡胶抛光系统抛光,然后用Optrafine HP刷子和金刚石抛光浆料进行最终抛光步骤。表面粗糙度(RA和RZ)值(MU M)通过型材计测量,使用单向ANOVA和TAMHANE的测试(HOC比较)进行比较平均值。在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下评估每组的一种样品,用于表面形貌。使用普通试验机以0.5mm / min十字头速度测量杆的三点弯曲强度值,并记录。使用单向ANOVA和TAMHANE测试(alpha = 0.05)分析数据。结果在RA,RZ(P <0.0001)和弯曲强度值(P <0.009)中,注意到统计学上存在统计学显着差异。在研磨Optrafine组(0.465 +/- 0.153)中发现最低的RA和Rz值,其显着低于玻璃(P <0.03)和研磨玻璃(P <0.001)组。两个抛光系统之间的RA和RZ值没有显着差异(P = 0.23和P = 0.25)。与研磨玻璃(P = 0.98)和研磨 - Optrafine基团(P = 0.86)相比,在玻璃玻璃组(283.350 +/- 49.854MPa)中发现了最高的弯曲强度而无明显差异(P = 0.86)。在磨削-D + Z组(225.070 +/-17.299)中发现了最低的抗弯强度,其与玻璃窗(P <0.03)和研磨玻璃(P&LT; 0.04)组显着不同。抛光表面的SEM分析揭示了一些条纹的常规形态。结论Optrafine系统在与玻璃相比,在数量(对于RA,P <0.01,对于RZ)的质量产生更平滑和更均匀的表面。用OPTRAFINE系统抛光后锂静止陶瓷的抗弯强度与玻璃窗(P = 0.86)相似。尽管用两种系统抛光后表面粗糙度相似,但D + Z系统降低了陶瓷的弯曲强度(P <0.03)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号