首页> 外文期刊>Journal of prosthodontics: official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists >Analysis of Surface Roughness, Fracture Toughness, and Weibull Characteristics of Different Framework-Veneer Dental Ceramic Assemblies after Grinding, Polishing, and Glazing
【24h】

Analysis of Surface Roughness, Fracture Toughness, and Weibull Characteristics of Different Framework-Veneer Dental Ceramic Assemblies after Grinding, Polishing, and Glazing

机译:磨削,抛光和玻璃化后不同框架 - 单板牙科陶瓷组件的表面粗糙度,断裂韧性和威布尔特性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose To compare the surface roughness and biaxial flexural strength of dental ceramics obtained after chairside surface modification by mechanical polishing procedures, versus laboratory reglazing. Materials and Methods Discs (16 x 1.5 +/- 1.6 mm) (N = 90) of various framework-veneering combinations were fabricated: D/FC: lithium disilicate/feldspathic ceramic; Z/AL: zirconium dioxide/aluminous ceramic; N/FC: noble alloy/feldspathic ceramic; N/FF: noble alloy feldspathic with fluorapatite; B/FC: base alloy/feldspathic ceramic; B/FF: base alloy/feldspathic ceramic with fluorapatite. In each group 10 specimens were ground using a diamond bur (46 mu m) and five were polished with silicone-reinforced disc polishers (25 mu m). Surface roughness (Ra) was measured using contact profilometry. After thermocycling in artificial saliva (6000 cycles, 5 to 55 +/- 5 degrees C), biaxial flexural strength was measured using "piston-on-three ball" test. The data (N) were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Bonferroni, and Tukey's posthoc tests. Weibull distribution values were calculated. Results Surface roughness was significantly higher in the ground group only (p 0.0001). Mean fracture toughness was significantly lower for chipping (RK: 287, HS: 22, ISO: 1099 MPa) than for total fracture (p 0.05), (RK: 841, HS:64, ISO: 3222 MPa). For chipping, Weibull distribution presented the highest shape value (m) for D/FC (3.82-5.07) and for total fracture for B/FC (3.69-4.6). Conclusion Chairside surface polishing restored veneer ceramic roughness and mechanical strength to the level of glazing. Feldspathic ceramic with fluorapatite presented better polishing results than conventional feldspathic ceramic did. Ceramic fused to metal was more resistant than lithium disilicate or zirconium dioxide framework-veneer assemblies. Lithium disilicate framework veneered with feldspathic ceramic presented more durability against chipping. Clinical implications: After chairside occlusal modifications in the surfaces of cemented all-ceramic or fused-to-metal FDPs, mechanical polishing procedures should always be carried out.
机译:目的是通过机械抛光程序比较董事会表面改性后获得的牙科陶瓷的表面粗糙度和双轴弯曲强度,与实验室雷鬼。制造各种框架 - 塑料组合的材料和方法圆盘(16×1.5 +/- 1.6 mm)(n = 90):D / Fc:锂硅酸锂/连体陶瓷; Z / Al:二氧化锆/铝陶瓷; N / FC:贵族合金/长期性陶瓷; n / ff:富含荧光石的高贵合金; B / FC:基础合金/连体陶瓷; B / FF:基础合金/连体陶瓷,具有氟磷灰石。在每组10中,使用金刚石Bur(46μm)研磨,用硅氧烷增强盘抛光剂(25μm)抛光五个。使用触点轮廓测量测量表面粗糙度(RA)。在人造唾液中热循环(6000次循环,5至55℃)后,使用“活塞 - 三个球”测试测量双轴弯曲强度。使用单向Anova,Bonferroni和Tukey的Posthoc测试分析数据(n)。计算威布尔分布值。结果粗糙度仅在地面粗糙度显着高(P <0.0001)。对于总骨折(P <0.05),(RK:287,HS:22,ISO:1099MPa),平均断裂韧性显着降低(RK:287,HS:22,ISO:1099MPa),(RK:841,HS:64,ISO:3222MPa)。对于切削,Weibull分布为D / Fc(3.82-5.07)呈现最高的形状值(m)和B / Fc的总骨折(3.69-4.6)。结论主席表面抛光恢复胶合陶瓷粗糙度和机械强度达到玻璃水平。具有荧光石的长期性陶瓷呈现比传统的长度陶瓷的抛光效果更好。陶瓷融合金属比锂硅酸锂或二氧化锆框架 - 贴面组件更耐受。锂静止框架嵌体与长期性陶瓷塑造更耐用的碎裂。临床意义:在粘合的全陶瓷或融合金属FDP表面的表面侧呼吸咬合修饰后,应始终进行机械抛光程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号