Assessing the methodological and reporting quality of clinical systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric urology: can practices on contemporary highest levels of evidence be built?

OKelly F.; DeCotiis K.; Aditya I; Braga L. H.; Koyle M. A.

首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pediatric urology >Assessing the methodological and reporting quality of clinical systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric urology: can practices on contemporary highest levels of evidence be built?

【24h】

Assessing the methodological and reporting quality of clinical systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric urology: can practices on contemporary highest levels of evidence be built?

机译：评估儿科泌尿外科临床系统评价和荟萃分析的方法论和报告质量：可以建立当代最高证据的实践吗？

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Introduction

机译：介绍

著录项

来源
《Journal of pediatric urology》 |2020年第2期|共11页
作者
OKelly F.; DeCotiis K.; Aditya I; Braga L. H.; Koyle M. A.;
展开▼
作者单位

Hosp Sick Children Div Urol Toronto ON Canada;

Hosp Sick Children Div Urol Toronto ON Canada;

Hosp Sick Children Div Urol Toronto ON Canada;

McMaster Childrens Hosp Div Urol Hamilton ON Canada;

Hosp Sick Children Div Urol Toronto ON Canada;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类儿科学;
关键词
Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Evidence; Paediatric urology; AMSTAR-2; PRISMA;

机译：荟萃分析;系统评价;证据;儿科泌尿外科;AMSTAR-2;PRISMA;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献

1. Assessing the methodological and reporting quality of clinical systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric urology: can practices on contemporary highest levels of evidence be built? [J] . OKelly F., DeCotiis K., Aditya I, Journal of pediatric urology . 2020,第2期

机译：评估儿科泌尿外科临床系统评价和荟萃分析的方法论和报告质量：可以建立当代最高证据的实践吗？
2. Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews referenced in the clinical practice guideline for pediatric high-blood pressure [J] . Vaughn Kaleb, Skinner Mason, Vaughn Victoria, Journal of hypertension . 2019,第3期

机译：儿科高血压临床实践指南参考的方法论和报告系统评价质量
3. Assessing the Methodological Quality of Glaucoma Clinical Practice Guidelines and Their Recommendations on Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery: A Systematic Review [J] . Michaelov Evan, Armstrong James J., Nguyen Mary, Journal of glaucoma . 2018,第2期

机译：评估青光眼临床实践指南的方法论质量及其关于微生物葡萄糖外科的建议：系统评价
4. Text mining in radiology reports (Methodologies and algorithms), and how it affects on workflow and supports decision making in clinical practice (Systematic review) [C] . Ahmad Al-Aiad, Tala El-shqeirat International Conference on Information and Communication Systems . 2020

机译：放射学报告中的文本挖掘（方法和算法），以及它如何影响工作流程并支持临床实践中的决策（系统评价）
5. Analysis of the Methodological Quality of Published Prosthodontic-related Systematic Reviews and their Impact on Clinical Practice, Research and Teaching According to the Correspondent Authors. [D] . Aziz, Tehnia. 2012

机译：据通讯作者分析，已发表的修复相关系统评价的方法学质量及其对临床实践，研究和教学的影响。
6. What Evidence Underlies Clinical Practice in Paediatric Surgery? A Systematic Review Assessing Choice of Study Design [O] . Benjamin Allin, Nicholas Aveyard, Timothy Campion-Smith, -1

机译：小儿外科临床实践的依据是什么？研究设计的系统评价评估选择
7. What Evidence Underlies Clinical Practice in Paediatric Surgery? A Systematic Review Assessing Choice of Study Design. [O] . Allin, B, Aveyard, N, Campion-Smith, T, 2016

机译：小儿外科临床实践的依据是什么？研究设计选择的系统评价。

Assessing the methodological and reporting quality of clinical systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric urology: can practices on contemporary highest levels of evidence be built?

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅