首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pain and symptom management. >Patient- and Caregiver-Reported Assessment Tools for Palliative Care: Summary of the 2017 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Technical Brief
【24h】

Patient- and Caregiver-Reported Assessment Tools for Palliative Care: Summary of the 2017 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Technical Brief

机译:患者和护理人员报告的姑息治疗评估工具:2017年医疗保健研究和质量技术简介摘要

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Context Assessment tools are data collection instruments that are completed by or with patients or caregivers and which collect data at the individual patient or caregiver level. Objectives The objectives of this study are to 1) summarize palliative care assessment tools completed by or with patients or caregivers and 2) identify needs for future tool development and evaluation. Methods We completed 1) a systematic review of systematic reviews; 2) a supplemental search of previous reviews and Web sites, and/or 3) a targeted search for primary articles when no tools existed in a domain. Paired investigators screened search results, assessed risk of bias, and abstracted data. We organized tools by domains from the National Consensus Project Clinical Practice Guidelines for Palliative Care and selected the most relevant, recent, and highest quality systematic review for each domain. Results We included 10 systematic reviews and identified 152 tools (97 from systematic reviews and 55 from supplemental sources). Key gaps included no systematic review for pain and few tools assessing structural, cultural, spiritual, or ethical/legal domains, or patient-reported experience with end-of-life care. Psychometric information was available for many tools, but few studies evaluated responsiveness (sensitivity to change) and no studies compared tools. Conclusion Few to no tools address the spiritual, ethical, or cultural domains or patient-reported experience with end-of-life care. While some data exist on psychometric properties of tools, the responsiveness of different tools to change and/or comparisons between tools have not been evaluated. Future research should focus on developing or testing tools that address domains for which few tools exist, evaluating responsiveness, and comparing tools.
机译:摘要上下文评估工具是由患者或护理人员完成的数据收集仪器,并在个人患者或照顾者水平上收集数据。目的本研究的目标是1)总结患者或护理人员完成的姑息治疗评估工具,2)确定未来工具开发和评估的需求。方法完成了1)系统评价系统审查; 2)在没有在域中存在的工具存在时,对先前评论和网站的补充搜索和/或3)针对主要文章的目标搜索。配对的调查人员筛选了搜索结果,评估了偏置的风险和抽象的数据。我们通过国家共识项目临床实践指南组织了席位的席位,为每个领域选择了最相关,最近和最高质量的系统审查。结果我们包括10个系统评价,并确定了152个工具(来自系统评价的97个工具,从补充来源的55种)。关键差距包括对疼痛和少数工具进行系统审查,评估结构,文化,精神或道德/法律域名或患者报告的终身关心经验。对于许多工具提供了心理学测量信息,但很少有研究评估响应性(对变化的敏感性),并且没有研究比较工具。结论少数工具涉及精神,道德或文化领域或患者报告的生活经验。虽然有些数据存在于工具的心理测量属性上,但尚未评估工具之间更改和/或比较的不同工具的响应性。未来的研究应侧重于开发或测试地址的工具,该工具解决了少数工具,评估响应性和比较工具的域名。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号