...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of bioethics >Policy and the Inevitability of Sharing: GINA and Social Media
【24h】

Policy and the Inevitability of Sharing: GINA and Social Media

机译:政策和共享的必然性:GINA和社交媒体

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In "Protecting Posted Genes: Social Networking and the Limits of GINA," Sandra Lee and Emily Borgelt (2014) present a deep and thoughtful consideration of the challenges of protecting genetic privacy in a digital era dominated by social media. According to Lee and Borgelt, while there is "little doubt that GINA represents a significant advance in protection against discriminatory use of genetic information," "nonetheless, practical issues in the context of social networking and PGI may stymie the enforceability of the statute" (39). Following their analysis, Lee and Borgelt make three policy recommendations to address the limits of GINA: (1) consumer and user education regarding the limits of GINA and the burden of proof in litigation, (2) recognition that all social media may house genetic information, and (3) legislation to limit or prevent employers from requesting access to employees' social media accounts (Lee and Borgelt 2014).
机译:Sandra Lee和Emily Borgelt(2014)在“保护已发布的基因:社交网络和GINA的局限性”中,对社交媒体主导的数字时代中保护遗传隐私的挑战进行了深刻而深思的考虑。根据Lee和Borgelt的说法,尽管“毫无疑问,GINA代表了在防止歧视性使用遗传信息方面的重大进步,”“不过,在社交网络和PGI的背景下,实际问题可能会阻碍该法规的可执行性”( 39)。经过分析,Lee和Borgelt提出了三项政策建议以解决GINA的局限性:(1)对GINA的局限性和诉讼举证责任进行消费者和用户教育;(2)认识到所有社交媒体都可以存储遗传信息(3)限制或阻止雇主要求访问雇员的社交媒体帐户的立法(Lee and Borgelt 2014)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号