首页> 外文期刊>Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene >The recommended Threshold Limit Values for heat exposure fail to maintain body core temperature within safe limits in older working adults
【24h】

The recommended Threshold Limit Values for heat exposure fail to maintain body core temperature within safe limits in older working adults

机译:热曝光的推荐阈值限制值未能在老年工作成年人的安全限制内保持体内核心温度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: The American Conference of Governmental and Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH~R) Threshold Limit Values (TLV~R guidelines) for work in the heat consist of work-rest (WR) allocations designed to ensure a stable core temperature that does not exceed 38 degC. However, the TLV~R guidelines have not been validated in older workers. This is an important shortcoming given that adults as young as 40 years demonstrate impairments in their ability to dissipate heat. We therefore evaluated body temperature responses in older adults during work performed in accordance to the TLV ~R recommended guidelines. Methods: On three occasions, 9 healthy older (58 :r 5 years) males performed a 120-min work-simulated protocol in accordance with the TLV~R guidelines for moderate-to-heavy intensity work (360 W fixed rate of heat production) in different wet-bulb globe temperatures (WBGT). The first was 120 min of continuous (CON) cycling at 28.0 C WBGT (CON[28-degC]). The other two protocols were 15-min intermittent work bouts performed with different WR cycles and WBGT: (i) WR of 3:1 at 29.0degC (WR3:1[29degC]) and (ii) WR of 1:1 at 30.0degC (WR1:1[30degC]). Recta! temperature was measured continuously. The rate of change in mean body temperature was determined via thermometry (weighting coefficients: rectal, 0.9; mean skin temperature, 0.1) and direct calorimetry. Results: Rectal temperature exceeded 38 C in all participants in CON[28degC] and WR3:1[29degC] whereas a statistically similar proportion of workers exceeded 38degC in WR1:1[30degC] (?; P = 0.32). The average time for rectal temperature to reach 38 C was: CON[28degC], 53 +- 7; WR3:1[29 degC], 79 ?1; and WR1:1[30 degC], 100 ?9 min. Finally, while a stable mean body temperature was not achieved in any work condition as measured by thermometry (i.e., >0degCmin~-1;all P<.0.01), heat balance as determined by direct calorimetry was achieved in WR3:1[29degC] and WR1:1L30degC] (both P >= 0.08). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the TLV~R guidelines do not prevent body core temperature from exceeding 38degC in older workers. Furthermore, a stable core temperature was not achieved within safe limits (i.e., <=38 C) indicating that the TLV~R guidelines may not adequately protect all individuals during work in hot conditions.
机译:目的:美国政府和工业卫生主义者(ACGIH〜R)阈值限制值(TLV〜R指南)在热量中的工作组成,由工作休息(WR)拨款,旨在确保不超过38的稳定核心温度Degc。但是,TLV〜R指南尚未在老年工人验证。这是一个重要的缺点,因为这位年仅40年的成年人展示了消散热量的能力的损伤。因此,我们根据TLV〜R推荐指南进行的工作期间评估了老年人的体温响应。方法:在三次,9种健康较大(58:R 5岁)男性按照TLV〜R为中等重度强度工作的准则进行了120分钟的工作模拟协议(360 W固定的热量速率)在不同的湿灯泡地球温度(WBGT)中。第一种是在28.0c Wbgt(Con [28-Degc])下连续(Con)的120分钟。另外两种方案是15分钟的间歇性工作伴侣,用不同的WR循环和WBGT:(i)WR为3:1,在29.0degc(WR3:1 [29degc])和(ii)wr为1:1在30.0 degc (WR1:1 [30DEGC])。僵死!连续测量温度。通过温度测定平均体温度的变化率(加权系数:直肠,0.9;平均皮肤温度,0.1)和直接量热法。结果:在CON [28DEGC]和WR3:1 [29DEGC]的所有参与者中,直肠温度超过38℃,而在WR1:1 [30degc](?; p = 0.32)中,统计上类似的工人比例超过38℃。直肠温度达到38℃的平均时间是:CON [28DEGC],53 + - 7; WR3:1 [29 degc],79?1;和WR1:1 [30 degc],100?9分钟。最后,虽然在通过温度测量的任何工作条件下(即> 0degcmin〜-1;所有p <.0.01),但在WR3:1中实现了通过直接量热法测定的热平衡[29degc ]和WR1:1L30DEGC](P> = 0.08)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,TLV〜R指南不会阻止体内核心温度超过38岁的老年工人。此外,在安全限制(即,<= 38℃)内未实现稳定的核心温度,表明TLV〜R指南在热条件下的工作中可能无法充分保护所有人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号