...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of oncology pharmacy practice: official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners >Ciprofloxacin vs. levofloxacin for prophylaxis in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
【24h】

Ciprofloxacin vs. levofloxacin for prophylaxis in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

机译:环丙氟苯胺与左氧氟沙星用于造血干细胞移植受者的预防

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Infection is the most common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing myleosuppressive therapy with the risk of infection being heightened during the neutropenic phase. Fluoroquinolones are most often utilized as prophylaxis, specifically levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin; however, there is increasing resistance among these agents. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin when used prophylactically in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients. Study design A retrospective cohort study conducted at a 443-bed tertiary teaching county hospital from 1 January 2005 to 31 September 2016. Methods Patients aged 18-89 who were admitted and received levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were evaluated. Results The patient population (N = 151) was predominantly male (93 vs. 58) and the median (IQR) age was 57 (20.1) years. There were 108 patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation compared to 43 undergoing allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Significantly fewer patients who received levofloxacin (11/43, 25.6%) developed neutropenic fever compared to patients who received ciprofloxacin (61/108, 56.5%, p = 0.0006). Also there were significantly more positive blood cultures in the ciprofloxacin group (36/108, 33.3%) compared to the levofloxacin group (4/43, 9.3%); the majority of which were Gram-positive organisms (p = 0.0025). Conclusion Prophylaxis with levofloxacin was associated with a lower incidence of febrile neutropenia and bacteremia when compared to ciprofloxacin in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients.
机译:背景技术感染是在中性阶段期间接受肌肉抑制治疗的患者的发病率和死亡率的最常见原因。氟喹诺酮类常规通常用作预防,特别是左氧氟沙星或环丙沙星;然而,这些药剂之间存在越来越大的抗性。本研究的目的是比较环丙沙星和左氧氟沙星在预防造血干细胞移植患者中使用时的疗效。学习设计从2005年1月1日至2016年9月31日到2016年1月1日至9月31日进行的443床教教学县医院进行了回顾性队列研究。方法评估了18-89岁的患者患者患者,并获得左氧氟沙星或环氧加仑后后造血干细胞移植。结果患者群体(n = 151)主要是男性(93 vs.58),中位数(IQR)年龄为57(20.1)岁。与43次接受同种异体造血干细胞移植相比,有108名患者接受自体造血干细胞移植。与接受环丙沙星(61 / 108,56.5%,P = 0.0006)的患者相比,接受左氧氟沙星(11/43,21,25.6%)发育中性级发烧的患者显着较少。与左氧氟沙星基团(4/43,9.3%)相比,环丙沙星基团(36/108,33.3%)中还有显着较大的血液培养物;其中大多数是革兰氏阳性生物(P = 0.0025)。结论与造血干细胞移植患者中环丙沙星相比,左氧氟沙星的预防与发热中性粒细胞缺乏症和菌血症的发生率较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号