...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology >COMPARISON OF RADIAL AND AXIAL FLOW CHROMATOGRAPHY FOR MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY DOWNSTREAM PROCESSING AT BENCH AND PILOT SCALES
【24h】

COMPARISON OF RADIAL AND AXIAL FLOW CHROMATOGRAPHY FOR MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY DOWNSTREAM PROCESSING AT BENCH AND PILOT SCALES

机译:台式和飞行员标量的单克隆抗体下行流处理的径向和轴向流色谱比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Axial Flow Chromatography (AFC) is widely used for the purification of therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies (MAbs). However, AFC columns can generate high pressure drops across the resin bed, preventing operation of the column at high flow rates especially at pilot or manufacturing-scales. Radial Flow Chromatography (RFC) was developed to provide lower pressure drops during chromatographic separations. In these studies, small and pilot-scale columns were used to evaluate purification of a MAb using bothAFC and RFC technologies. A bench-scale, wedge RFC column (250 mL) was compared to a bench-scale AFC column at various linear velocities with resulting Residence Times (RT) using Protein A resin for the recovery of a monoclonal antibody. The bench RFCcolumn was successfully operated at 4.5 min RT for equilibration and loading steps and 2 min RT for washing, elution and cleaning steps without compromising yield. The RFC column had approximately 50% lower pressure drop than the AFC column at similar flow rates. The process was then scaled-up to 5 L using a pilot-scale RFC column. The 5-L RFC column was operated at 4.5 min RT for equilibration and loading and 2 min. RT for washing, elution and cleaning with no loss of yield. However, pressure drop across the 5 L RFC column was higher than expected, but antibody recovery yields were similar for both column types. Subsequent investigations revealed a potential design issue with the RFC column. Overall, RFC has great potential to be used for pilot or manufacturing scale without high pressure drop concerns, which will certainly improve processing efficiency.
机译:轴流色谱法(AFC)被广泛用于纯化治疗性单克隆抗体(MAb)。但是,AFC色谱柱会在整个树脂床上产生高压降,从而阻止了该色谱柱在高流速下运行,尤其是在中试规模或制造规模下。径向流色谱(RFC)的开发旨在在色谱分离过程中提供较低的压降。在这些研究中,使用中小规模的色谱柱来评估使用AFC和RFC技术的单克隆抗体的纯化。使用蛋白质A树脂回收单克隆抗体,将台式线性楔形RFC色谱柱(250 mL)与台式线性AFC色谱柱在各种线速度下进行比较,得出保留时间(RT)。台式RFC色谱柱成功地在4.5分钟的RT下进行平衡和上样步骤,并在2分钟的RT下进行了洗涤,洗脱和清洗步骤,而没有影响收率。在相似的流速下,RFC色谱柱的压降比AFC色谱柱低约50%。然后,使用中试规模的RFC色谱柱将过程放大至5L。 5-L RFC色谱柱在室温下运行4.5分钟以平衡和加载,并在2分钟内运行。 RT用于洗涤,洗脱和清洁,无损失收率。但是,在5 L RFC色谱柱上的压降高于预期,但两种色谱柱的抗体回收率均相似。随后的调查显示RFC列存在潜在的设计问题。总体而言,RFC具有很大的潜力可用于中试规模或制造规模,而无需担心高压降,这肯定会提高处理效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号