A Comparison of Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) Absorption Rates in Gynecologic Laparoscopy with a Valveless Insufflation System Versus Standard Insufflation System at Intra-Abdominal Pressures of 10?mmHg and 15?mmHg – A Randomized Controlled Trial

O.S. Madueke-Laveaux; A.P. Advincula; R. Landau-Cahana; R. Walters; C. Grimes; J.H. Kim; K. Simpson; M. Truong; C. Young; T. Ryntz

首页> 外文期刊>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology >A Comparison of Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) Absorption Rates in Gynecologic Laparoscopy with a Valveless Insufflation System Versus Standard Insufflation System at Intra-Abdominal Pressures of 10?mmHg and 15?mmHg – A Randomized Controlled Trial

【24h】

A Comparison of Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) Absorption Rates in Gynecologic Laparoscopy with a Valveless Insufflation System Versus Standard Insufflation System at Intra-Abdominal Pressures of 10?mmHg and 15?mmHg – A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译：跨科学腹腔镜中的二氧化碳（CO 2）吸收率与阀芯腹腔镜腹腔镜与腹部压力的标准吹蛋系统10？mmHg和15？mmHg - 一种随机对照试验

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《Journal of minimally invasive gynecology》 |2017年第7期|共2页
作者
O.S. Madueke-Laveaux; A.P. Advincula; R. Landau-Cahana; R. Walters; C. Grimes; J.H. Kim; K. Simpson; M. Truong; C. Young; T. Ryntz;
展开▼
作者单位

Gynecologic Specialty Surgery Columbia University Medical Center;

Gynecologic Specialty Surgery Columbia University Medical Center;

Gynecologic Specialty Surgery Columbia University Medical Center;

Gynecologic Specialty Surgery Columbia University Medical Center;

Gynecologic Specialty Surgery Columbia University Medical Center;

Gynecologic Specialty Surgery Columbia University Medical Center;

Gynecologic Specialty Surgery Columbia University Medical Center;

Obstetrics and Gynecology Virginia Commonwealth University;

Gynecologic Specialty Surgery Columbia University Medical Center;

Gynecologic Specialty Surgery Columbia University Medical Center;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类妇产科学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. A Comparison of Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) Absorption Rates in Gynecologic Laparoscopy with a Valveless Insufflation System Versus Standard Insufflation System at Intra-Abdominal Pressures of 10?mmHg and 15?mmHg – A Randomized Controlled Trial [J] . O.S. Madueke-Laveaux, A.P. Advincula, R. Landau-Cahana, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology . 2017,第7期

机译：跨科学腹腔镜中的二氧化碳（CO 2）吸收率与阀芯腹腔镜腹腔镜与腹部压力的标准吹蛋系统10？mmHg和15？mmHg - 一种随机对照试验
2. A Comparison of Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) Absorption Rates in Gynecologic Laparoscopy with a Valveless Insufflation System Versus Standard Insufflation System at Intra-Abdominal Pressures of 10?mmHg and 15?mmHg – A Randomized Controlled Trial [J] . O.S. Madueke-Laveaux, A.P. Advincula, R. Landau-Cahana, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology . 2017,第7期

机译：跨科学腹腔镜中的二氧化碳（CO 2）吸收率与阀芯腹腔镜腹腔镜与腹部压力的标准吹蛋系统10？mmHg和15？mmHg - 一种随机对照试验
3. Comparison of Carbon Dioxide Absorption Rates in Gynecologic Laparoscopy with a Valveless versus Standard Insufflation System: Randomized Controlled Trial [J] . Madueke-Laveaux Obianuju S., Advincula Arnold, Grimes Cara L., Journal of minimally invasive gynecology . 2020,第1期

机译：跨型腹腔镜中的二氧化碳吸收率与阀门腹腔镜与标准吹蛋系统的比较：随机对照试验
4. Comparison of a Geosynthetic Drainage System Versus Standard Aggregate System for Foundation Drainage (Basement Walls) in a Controlled Laboratory Environment [C] . H. Mock, B. Sigmon, M. Wait, Geo-Frontiers 2005 . 2005

机译：受控实验室环境中土工合成排水系统与标准排水系统（基础墙）的比较
5. Mechanism and kinetics of oxidative degradation of carbon dioxide-loaded concentrated aqueous MEA/MDEA blends during carbon dioxide absorption from flue gas streams of industrial power systems. [D] . Lawal, Ayanduntan Olanike. 2005

机译：从工业动力系统的烟气流中吸收二氧化碳期间，负载有二氧化碳的浓MEA / MDEA混合水溶液的氧化降解机理和动力学。
6. Efficacy and safety of carbon dioxide insufflation versus air insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis [O] . Marina Lordello Passos, Igor Braga Ribeiro, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, 2019

机译：内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中二氧化碳吹入与空气吹入的有效性和安全性在随机对照试验中：系统评价和荟萃分析
7. Efficacy and safety of carbon dioxide insufflation versus air insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis [O] . Marina Passos, Igor Ribeiro, Diogo de Moura, 2019

机译：在随机对照试验中的内窥镜逆行胆管膜凝视期间二氧化碳吹蛋的功效和安全性与空气吹入性：系统评价和荟萃分析

A Comparison of Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) Absorption Rates in Gynecologic Laparoscopy with a Valveless Insufflation System Versus Standard Insufflation System at Intra-Abdominal Pressures of 10?mmHg and 15?mmHg – A Randomized Controlled Trial

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅