首页> 外文期刊>Journal of minimally invasive gynecology >Laparoscopic Excision Versus Ablation for Endometriosis-associated Pain: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
【24h】

Laparoscopic Excision Versus Ablation for Endometriosis-associated Pain: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

机译:腹腔镜切除与子宫内膜异位症相关的疼痛的消融:一个更新的系统评论和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this study was to update the evidence on the surgical management of endometriosis-associated pain. Does laparoscopic excision offer any benefits over laparoscopic ablation? This is a systematic review and meta-analysis in which we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Institute for Scientific Information conference proceedings, the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry, the Register and Meta-register for randomized controlled trials, the World Health Organization trials search portal, the Cochrane Library, and the British Library of electronic theses. Three randomized controlled trials were included, which enrolled 335 participants with a sample size per study ranging from 24 to 178 participants. Of these 3 studies, data from 2 could be pooled for meta-analysis. The primary outcome measure was the reduction in the visual analog scale score for dysmenorrhea. The secondary outcome measures included the reduction in the visual analog scale score for dyspareunia, dyschezia, and chronic pelvic pain and the reduction in Endometriosis Health Profile-30 core pain scores. The meta-analysis showed that the excision group had a significantly greater reduction in symptoms of dysmenorrhea (mean difference [MD] = 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.02 to 2.00; p =.05) and dyschezia (MD = 1.31; 95% CI, 0.33-2.29; p =.009) compared with ablation. The symptoms of dyspareunia showed a nonsignificant benefit with excision (MD = 0.96; 95% CI, -0.07 to 1.99; p =.07). Data from I study showed a significant reduction in chronic pelvic pain (MD = 2.57; 95% CI, 1.27-3.87; p =.0001) and Endometriosis Health Profile-30 core pain scores (MD = 13.20; 95% Cl, 3.70-22.70; p =.006) with the excision group compared with the ablation group. The limited available evidence shows that at 12 months postsurgery, symptoms of dysmenorrhea, dyschezia, and chronic pelvic pain secondary to endometriosis showed a significantly greater improvement with laparoscopic excision compared with ablation. (C) 2017 AAGL. All rights reserved.
机译:本研究的目的是更新关于子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛的手术管理的证据。腹腔镜切除是否为腹腔镜消融提供了任何好处?这是一个系统审查和元分析,其中我们搜索了Medline,Embase,科学信息会议课程,国际标准随机控制试验编号登记处,随机对照试验的登记和元登记,世界卫生组织试验搜索门户,Cochrane图书馆和英国电子论文图书馆。包括三项随机对照试验,注册了335名参与者,每个研究的样本量为24至178名参与者。在这3研究中,可以汇集来自2的数据以进行Meta分析。主要结果措施是减少痛经的视觉模拟比分。二次结果措施包括减少呼吸困难,呼吸困难和慢性盆腔疼痛的视觉模拟规模分数以及子宫内膜异位症的减少 - 30核心疼痛评分。荟萃分析表明,切除组在痛经症状减少(平均差异[MD] = 0.99; 95%置信区间[CI],-0.02至2.00; P = .05)和Dyschezia(MD = 1.31; 95%CI,0.33-2.29; p = .009)与消融相比。 Dyspareunia的症状表现出不显着的益处(MD = 0.96; 95%CI,-0.07至1.99; p = .07)。来自我研究的数据显示慢性骨盆疼痛的显着降低(MD = 2.57; 95%CI,1.27-3.87; p = .0001)和子宫内膜异位症健康型 - 30核心疼痛评分(MD = 13.20; 95%CL,3.70- 22.70; p = .006)与Eccision组与消融组相比。有限的可用证据表明,在12个月后,痛经症状,呼吸困难和慢性盆腔疼痛,中间宫源病表现出与腹腔镜切除相比的显着提高。 (c)2017 AAGL。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号