首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurosurgical sciences >Invisible Digital Front: Can Cyber Attacks Shape Battlefield Events?
【24h】

Invisible Digital Front: Can Cyber Attacks Shape Battlefield Events?

机译:看不见的数字前线:网络攻击塑造战场事件吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Recent years have seen growing concern over the use of cyber attacks in wartime, but little evidence that these new tools of coercion can change battlefield events. We present the first quantitative analysis of the relationship between cyber activities and physical violence during war. Using new event data from the armed conflict in Ukraineand additional data from Syria's civil warwe analyze the dynamics of cyber attacks and find that such activities have had little or no impact on fighting. In Ukraineone of the first armed conflicts where both sides deployed such tools extensivelycyber activities failed to compel discernible changes in battlefield behavior. Indeed, hackers on both sides have had difficulty responding to battlefield events, much less shaping them. An analysis of conflict dynamics in Syria produces similar results: the timing of cyber actions is independent of fighting on the ground. Our findingthat cyber attacks are not (yet) effective as tools of coercion in warhas potentially significant implications for other armed conflicts with a digital front.
机译:近年来对战时使用网络攻击的兴趣日益令人担忧,但有没有证据表明这些新的胁迫工具可以改变战场事件。我们提出了对战争期间网络活动与身体暴力关系的第一次定量分析。使用来自乌克兰的武装冲突中的新事件数据来自叙利亚的民用战争的额外数据,分析了网络攻击的动态,并发现此类活动几乎没有对战斗的影响。在乌克兰的第一批武装冲突中,双方部署了这些工具,广泛的犬活动未能强迫战场行为的可辨别变化。实际上,双方的黑客难以回应战场事件,更少塑造它们。对叙利亚冲突动态的分析产生了类似的结果:网络行为的时间与地面的战斗无关。我们的发现没有(然而)没有(又一)作为战争中的胁迫工具有效地对与数字前沿的其他武装冲突产生重大影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号