首页> 外文期刊>Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology >Regional Versus General Anesthesia: Effect of Anesthetic Techniques on Clinical Outcome in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Regional Versus General Anesthesia: Effect of Anesthetic Techniques on Clinical Outcome in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:区域与全身麻醉:麻醉技术对腰椎外科临床结果的影响:预期随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: There are only a few prospective clinical trials investigating the effects of different anesthetic techniques on clinical outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients receiving general (GA) and regional anesthesia (RA) for lumbar spine surgery. Methods: This was a single-center, 2-arm, trial in which 100 patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery were randomized to receive either RA or GA (50 per group). The primary endpoint was morphine consumption during the first postoperative 48 hours. In addition, anesthesia time, transition time (defined as time from end of surgery to admission to the postoperative anesthesia care unit), visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and patient satisfaction at hospital discharge were recorded. Results: There was no difference in the primary endpoint (cumulative morphine consumption at 48 h) between the 2 anesthesia types. Anesthesia and transition times were significantly shorter in the RA compared with the GA group-anesthesia time 125.4 +/- 23.6 minutes for GA versus 99.4 +/- 13.5 minutes for RA, transition time 22.5 minutes for GA versus 10.0 minutes for RA (both P<0.001). The VAS for pain on arrival to the postoperative anesthetic care unit was lower for patients who received RA compared with GA (crude and adjusted, both <0.001). 84% of patients in the RA group were completely satisfied compared with 74% in the GA group (P<0.001). There was a significant difference in the sex analysis for VAS for pain over time; females reported higher VAS for pain from the preoperative assessment to 6 weeks after the operation (P<0.001). Conclusions: There was no difference in postoperative morphine consumption in patients receiving GA and RA for lumbar spine surgery. RA was associated with shorter anesthesia and transition times, lower VAS for pain at arrival at the postoperative anesthesia care unit, and higher patient satisfaction at hospital discharge.
机译:背景:只有少数前瞻性临床试验研究了不同麻醉技术对腰椎手术后临床结果的影响。本研究的目的是评估接受患者(GA)和腰椎手术的患者患者的临床结果。方法:这是单中心,2臂,试验,其中患有腰椎手术的100名患者随机接受RA或GA(每组50级)。主要终点在第48小时内的第一个术后终点是吗啡消费。此外,麻醉时间,过渡时间(定义为从手术结束到术后麻醉护理单元的时间),记录疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS),并记录医院排放的患者满意度。结果:2个麻醉类型之间的主要终点(48小时内累积吗啡消费的累积类别无差异。与GA的GA组麻醉时间相比,GA与RA的GA +/- 23.6分钟相比,麻醉和转变时间明显较短。对于RA,过渡时间22.5分钟GA对10.0分钟进行Ra(P <0.001)。与GA(原油和调整后,<0.001)相比,收到RA的患者,抵达术后麻醉保健单元的疼痛VAS较低。 84%的RA组患者完全满足于GA组中的74%(P <0.001)。随着时间的推移疼痛的痛苦的性别分析存在显着差异;女性报告术前评估的疼痛较高的VAS术后6周(P <0.001)。结论:患者患者术后吗啡消费没有差异,接受肿瘤手术的GA和RA。 RA与较短的麻醉和过渡时间有关,急诊到达术后麻醉护理单位的VAS患者,以及医院排放的更高患者满意度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号