...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance >Effect of Tempering Mode on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of a Lean Alloy Martensitic Steel: Conventional Reheating Versus Induction Reheating
【24h】

Effect of Tempering Mode on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of a Lean Alloy Martensitic Steel: Conventional Reheating Versus Induction Reheating

机译:回火模式对贫合金马氏体钢微观结构和力学性能的影响:常规再加热与感应再加热

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The present study elucidates the effect of the reheating rate and tempering temperature on the type, size, and distribution of carbides/cementite formed within martensite (M)/lower bainite (LB) during the tempering of a high-strength low-alloy (HSLA) steel. A comparison is made between conventional reheating and induction reheating. All the experimental samples were quenched from the austenitization temperature of 920 degrees C for 30min. An ultra-high yield strength of 1180MPa and a good toughness of 94J at 0 degrees C were obtained after tempering at 400 degrees C for 15min by induction reheating (similar to 100 degrees C/s), while in the case of conventional reheating (similar to 2 degrees C/s) and tempering at 400 degrees C for 15min, the steel had a high strength of 1159MPa, but a poor toughness of 47J at 0 degrees C. After induction reheating to 500 degrees C and tempering for 15min, a higher toughness was obtained (91J at 0 degrees C), but the strength was decreased to 967MPa. Microstructural characterization revealed that fine needle-like carbides (epsilon-Fe2.4C) were obtained by induction reheating to 400 degrees C and tempering for 15min. However, samples tempered at 400 degrees C by conventional reheating and 500 degrees C by induction reheating both precipitated coarse -Fe3C. In the former, -Fe3C precipitated at locations that were previously austenite grain boundaries and led to tempered martensite embrittlement (TME). In the latter, Ostwald ripening occurred, and the precipitates could not maintain high strength. The excellent mechanical properties of induction reheated steel (400 degrees C, 15min) are attributed to the following aspects: (a) The selection of appropriate tempering temperature did not lead to decarburization and ensured high strength, and (b) a high reheating rate promoted carbide dispersion and avoided TME in steel.
机译:本研究阐明了在高强度低合金(HSLA)的高强度(HSLA ) 钢。在传统的再加热和感应再加热之间进行比较。将所有实验样品从920℃的奥氏体化温度淬灭30min。在400℃下在400℃的回火后,在400℃下,通过感应再加热(类似于100℃/ s),在400℃下进行的超高屈服强度和94J的良好韧性。在常规再加热的情况下(类似在2℃/ s)和400℃下的回火15分钟,钢的强度高1159MPa,但在0℃下的47J的韧性差。诱导再加热至500℃并回火15min后,较高获得韧性(0℃的91J),但强度降至967MPa。微观结构表征显示,通过诱导再加热至400℃并回火15min而获得细小的针状碳化物(EPSILON-FE2.4C)。然而,通过常规再加热和500℃通过感应再加热再加热的沉淀的粗糙-Fe3C来样品在400℃下回火。在前前, - 在先前奥氏体晶界的位置沉淀出来,并导致锻炼马氏体脆化(TME)。在后者,发生了骨果实成熟,沉淀物不能保持高强度。感应再加热钢(400℃,15min)的优异机械性能归因于以下几个方面:(a)选择适当的回火温度并未导致脱碳并确保高强度,(b)促进的高再加热率硬质合金分散,避免钢制TME。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号