...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of molecular cell biology >Freedom from Persecution or Continued Abuse? An Analysis of the Meaning of Rights in Refugee Communities
【24h】

Freedom from Persecution or Continued Abuse? An Analysis of the Meaning of Rights in Refugee Communities

机译:免受迫害或继续虐待的自由? 难民社区权利含义分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The resettlement of refugees from a place of danger to a safe country brings an assumption of security, peace and access to human rights. It should herald the beginning of a fulfilling life in a new homeland. Australia has a resettlement programme of about 13,000 people per year. Many of these people settle extremely well and successfully establish themselves and their families in the Australian community. However, research over the past decade into settlement experience has highlighted the fact that not all newly arrived refugees have a positive settlement experience, and many put the blame for the problems they experience on ‘human rights’. Funding was obtained from the Australian Research Council by the authors to explore what exactly the concept of ‘human rights’ meant to diverse refugee communities. The research identified that the rights that were causing the majority of concern were women’s rights and children’s rights. They became the focus of all problems experienced in settlement, and named as the reason for the loss of dreams of a new and happy life. At the base was confusion and lack of understanding about the meaning of human rights and their links to Australian domestic law. This lack of knowledge was often shared by both refugees and the community members and settlement service providers who were endeavouring to assist them to settle successfully. The research identified that the problem was complex and intersectional. It was obvious that a sophisticated analysis was needed to explore the issue and to identify solutions. Klug’s suggested analytical framework of human rights as part law, part philosophy, and part political movement was found to be extremely appropriate, facilitating the application of three very different lenses. It was used as a tool to unpack the different interpretations of rights, and to identify potential solutions.
机译:从对安全国家的危险地方的难民的重新安置给了安全,和平和人权的假设。它应该先制定新的家园充实生活的开始。澳大利亚每年的移民安置计划约为13,000人。其中许多人在澳大利亚社区中成功地解决了自己及其家人。然而,在过去十年进入解决经验的研究突出了这一事实,即并非所有新抵达的难民都有积极的解决经验,许多人对他们对“人权”的问题归咎于他们的问题。作者从澳大利亚研究委员会获得资金,探讨了“人权”概念对难民社区的概念。该研究确定导致大多数关注的权利是妇女的权利和儿童权利。他们成为解决中所有问题的重点,并被命名为失去新的幸福生活的梦想的原因。在基地是混乱,缺乏对人权含义的识别及其与澳大利亚国内法的联系。这种缺乏知识通常由难民和社区成员和结算服务提供者共享,他们努力协助他们成功解决。该研究确定了问题很复杂和交叉。很明显,需要复杂的分析来探索问题并识别解决方案。 Klug建议作为部分法律,部分哲学和部分政治运动的人权的建议分析框架非常合适,促进了三个非常不同的镜片的应用。它被用作解压缩不同权利解放的工具,并识别潜在的解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号