首页> 外文期刊>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI >Evaluation of Breast Cancer Morphology Using Diffusion‐Weighted and Dynamic Contrast‐Enhanced MRI: Intermethod and Interobserver Agreement
【24h】

Evaluation of Breast Cancer Morphology Using Diffusion‐Weighted and Dynamic Contrast‐Enhanced MRI: Intermethod and Interobserver Agreement

机译:利用扩散加权和动态对比增强MRI评估乳腺癌形态的评价:中断与interobserver协议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background The capability of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) for morphological analysis of breast lesions is underexplored. Purpose To evaluate the utility of DWI for assessment of morphological features of breast cancer by comparing DWI and dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) MRI findings to determine intermethod and interobserver agreement. Study Type Retrospective. Population Seventy‐eight women with pathohistologically proven breast cancer. Field Strength/Sequence 1.5T. DWI and DCE images. Assessment Diffusion‐weighted and DCE images were placed in two separate case sets. Three radiologists, blinded to all other information, independently evaluated each case set on two separate occasions. Lesions were interpreted according to the fifth edition of the ACR BI‐RADS lexicon. Statistical Analysis Kappa (κ) statistics were calculated in order to assess intermethod and interobserver agreement. Results For values that attained statistical significance ( P 0.05), intermethod agreement ranged from fair (κ?=?0.22) for nonmass internal patterns to significant (κ?=?0.8) for lesion type. On DWI, interobserver agreement varied from fair (κ?=?0.34) for mass shape to significant (κ?=?0.75) for lesion type. On DCE MRI, interobserver agreement varied from fair (κ?=?0.27) for irregular vs. spiculated mass margin to perfect (κ?=?1) for circumscribed vs. noncircumscribed mass margin. Data Conclusion On the whole, there was moderate intermethod agreement. The values of interobserver agreement were mostly similar between DWI and DCE MRI. This suggests that DWI is applicable for morphological assessment of breast cancer, notwithstanding substantially inferior spatial resolution compared to DCE MRI. Level of Evidence : 3 Technical Efficacy : Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:1381–1390.
机译:背景技术扩散加权成像(DWI)用于乳房病变的形态分析的能力是望远欠光。目的通过比较DWI和动态对比增强(DCE)MRI调查结果来评估DWI对乳腺癌形态特征的效用,以确定间歇和Interobserver协议。研究类型回顾。人口七十八名妇女有病情过性探明乳腺癌。场强/序列1.5T。 DWI和DCE图像。评估扩散加权和DCE图像被放置在两个单独的情况集中。三位放射科医师,蒙蔽了所有其他信息,独立地评估了在两个单独的场合上设置的每种情况。根据ACR Bi-Rads Lexicon的第五版解释病变。计算统计分析Kappa(κ)统计数字是为了评估intermethod和Interobserver协议。结果达到统计学意义的值(P& 0.05),间歇性协议范围从公平(κα= 0.22)到病变类型的非镉内部图案到显着(κα= 0.8)。在DWI上,Interobserver协议从公平(κα= 0.34)变化,对于病变类型的质量形状(κα= 0.75)。在DCE MRI上,Interobserver协议从公平(κ?= 0.27)变化,用于非正规与刺激的质量裕度,以完美(κα=Δ1),用于外接的与非渠额为距质量余量。数据结论全部,有适度的际译员协议。 Interobserver协议的价值在DWI和DCE MRI之间主要相似。这表明DWI适用于乳腺癌的形态学评估,尽管与DCE MRI相比,仍有大幅下滑的空间分辨率。证据水平:3技术疗效:第3阶段J. MANG。恢复。 2019年成像; 49:1381-1390。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号