...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI >BOLD‐fMRI with median nerve electrical stimulation predict hemodynamic improvement after revascularization in patients with moyamoya disease
【24h】

BOLD‐fMRI with median nerve electrical stimulation predict hemodynamic improvement after revascularization in patients with moyamoya disease

机译:大胆的FMRI与中位神经电刺激预测血淘病患者血运重建后的血流动力学改善

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose To assess the severity of cerebral hemodynamic impairment and hemodynamic improvements, after revascularization in moyamoya disease (MMD) by means of blood‐oxygen‐level dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD‐fMRI). Materials and Methods BOLD‐fMRI with median nerve electrical stimulation based on echo planar imaging was performed in 73 volunteers with MMD and 15 healthy volunteers using a 3.0 Tesla MRI scanner. Twenty‐four MMD patients were reexamined after encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis. Time‐signal intensity curves of the activated area of the contralateral primary somatosensory cortex were computed. Negative response time (Tnr) and peak (Pnr), positive response time (Tpr) and peak (Ppr), and time to negative peak (TTPn) and positive peak (TTPp) were measured. Results Compared with nonparesthesia group and the asymptomatic side of paresthesia group, the patients with paresthesia showed extended Tnr (22.04?±?3.34 s versus 9.57?±?2.27 s and 12.67?±?2.69 s, P ?=?0.0096), decreased Pnr (–0.47?±?0.06 versus –0.30?±?0.09 and –0.33?±?0.09, P ?=?0.010), delayed TTPn (9.04?±?1.39 s versus 3.66?±?0.79 s and 4.88?±?1.10 s, P ?=?0.0064), shortened Tpr (22.75?±?2.30 s versus 36.85?±?2.68 s and 33?±?2.49 s, P ?=?0.0010), and decreased Ppr (0.62?±?0.08 versus 0.99?±?0.15 and 0.97?±?0.11, P ?=?0.0149) when subjected to median nerve electrical stimulation in the symptomatic side. After surgery, the patients with paresthesia showed shorter Tnr (1.53?±?1.66 s versus 17.88?±?22.61 s, P ?=?0.0002), increased Pnr (–0.14?±?0.17 versus –0.44?±?0.53, P ?=?0.0178), advanced TTPn (1.29?±?1.21 s versus 7.29?±?8.21 s, P ?=?0.0005), extended Tpr (36.94?±?6.41 s versus 25.18?±?15.51 s, P ?=?0.0091), increased Ppr (1.21?±?0.87 versus 0.77?±?0.60, P ?=?0.0201), and advanced TTPp (11.18?±?4.70 s versus 27.29?±?20.00 s, P ?=?0.0046). Conclusion Bold‐fMRI is useful to assess disease severity and surgical efficacy in MMD. Level of Evidence: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 4 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1159–1166.
机译:目的是评估脑血流动损伤和血流动力学改善的严重程度,通过血氧水平依赖性功能磁共振成像(BOLD-FMRI)血对血清症(MMD)的血昔达疾病(MMD)之后。基于回声平面成像的材料和方法大胆-FMRI基于回声平面成像进行了73名志愿者,使用3.0特斯拉MRI扫描仪进行MMD和15名健康志愿者。在脑卒中后重新审视二十四个MMD患者。计算了对侧原发性躯体病皮层的活性面积的时间信号强度曲线。测量负响应时间(TNR)和峰值(PNR),阳性响应时间(TPR)和峰(PPR),以及负峰值(TTPN)和正峰(TTPP)。结果与非耐心基团和豚鼠的无症状相比,患有患者的患者延长了TNR(22.04?±3.34 S与9.57?2.27 S和12.67?±2.69 S,P?=?0.0096),减少PNR(-0.47?±±0.06与-0.30?±0.09和-0.33?±0.09,p?= 0.010),延迟TTPN(9.04?±1.1.39 s与3.66?±0.79 s和4.88?± ?1.10 s,p?= 0.0064),缩短tpr(22.75?±2.2.30 s与36.85?±2.68 s和33?±2. 4.49 s,p?=Δ0.0010),并且降低ppr(0.62?±? 0.08与0.99?±0.15和0.97?±0.11,p?=?0.0149)当受到症状侧的中位神经电刺激时。手术后,患有患者的患者显示较短的TNR(1.53?±1.1.66 S与17.88?22.61 s,p?=?0.0002),增加PNR(-0.14〜±0.17与-0.44?±0.17,p ?=?0.0178),高级TTPN(1.29?±1.1.21 s与7.29?±8.21 s,p?= 0.0005),扩展TPR(36.94?±6.41 s与25.18?±15.51 s,p?= <0.0091),PPR增加(1.21?±0.87与0.77°?±0.60,P?= 0.0201),先进的TTPP(11.18?±4.40 s与27.29?±20.00 s,p?= 0.0046) 。结论大胆-FMRI可用于评估MMD中的疾病严重程度和手术疗效。证据水平:1技术疗效:第4阶段J. MANG。恢复。 2017年成像; 46:1159-1166。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号