【24h】

Understanding PPPs and PPP-based National Accounts: Comment - I

机译:了解PPP和基于PPP的国民账户:评论-I

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Angus Deaton and Alan Heston (2010) have written an excellent paper on the latest round of the World Bank's 2005 International Comparison Program (ICP), how it was conducted, and how it will affect the Penn World Tables (PWT). They identify three major issues that make it difficult to construct consistent estimates of real output across countries: How exactly should we choose an index number formula that will enable us to compare real outputs across countries? Index number comparisons between countries require information on the prices of products in the same units of measurement and information on expenditure shares by product category. The ICP gets expenditure shares using information on final demand expenditures from the national accounts of the participating countries. However, these national expenditure estimates are not very accurate in some cases, and are not always constructed on a consistent basis across countries. It is very difficult or impossible to compare real outputs across countries at very different stages of development, since poor countries may consume products which are very different from the products consumed in rich countries (i.e., it is impossible to compare the incomparable).
机译:安格斯·迪顿(Angus Deaton)和艾伦·赫斯顿(Alan Heston)(2010)就世界银行最新一轮的2005年国际比较计划(ICP),如何进行以及如何影响宾大世界表(PWT)撰写了一篇出色的论文。他们指出了三个主要问题,这些问题使得难以对国家间的实际产出进行一致的估算:我们究竟应该如何选择一个指数公式来比较国家间的实际产出?各国之间的索引号比较需要使用相同计量单位的产品价格信息和按产品类别的支出份额信息。 ICP使用来自参与国国民账户的最终需求支出信息获取支出份额。但是,这些国家支出估算值在某些情况下不是很准确,并且并非始终在各个国家/地区之间建立一致的基础。比较处于不同发展阶段的国家的实际产出是非常困难或不可能的,因为贫穷国家所消费的产品可能与富裕国家所消费的产品截然不同(即,无法比较无与伦比的产品)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号