...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical engineering & technology >An exploratory analysis of U.S. FDA Class I medical device recalls: 2014–2018
【24h】

An exploratory analysis of U.S. FDA Class I medical device recalls: 2014–2018

机译:美国FDA I类医疗设备的探索性分析回忆:2014-2018

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Medical device manufacturing and distribution is globalised; consequently, medical device failures pose serious but preventable global public health hazard. Moreover, a clear understanding of recalls will help firms improve their operations. This study examines 871?U.S. FDA Class I (i.e. most serious) medical device recalls, highlights the shortcomings of the recall reporting system and proposes recommendations for improvement. Top three recall reasons are: “packaging” (47.4%), “component” issues (14%) and “design” (13.3%). About 40% of recall events have mischaracterised or ambiguous “FDA Determined Cause”. Ninety-four firms are related to the recalls and the majority (78%) of the recall events emanate from U.S.-headquartered firms. Thirty-four firms (36%) have been acquired or are a subsidiary of another. Results also yield recommendations for improvement. The cause classification scheme needs revision and there might be a case for more than one classification scheme. Specifically, the “device design” cause designation is conflated with “component quality” issues. “Other”, “unknown” and “under investigation” designations should be replaced with real cause determinations. The effectiveness of “Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)” and the impact of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) on device quality should be examined. Devising a “recall severity measure” and improving and standardising the recalls database are other important issues. Results and recommendations may hold lessons for other jurisdictions as well.
机译:医疗器械制造和分配是全球化的;因此,医疗器械失败构成严重但可预防的全球公共卫生危害。此外,清楚地了解召回将有助于公司改善其运营。这项研究审查了871年?美国。 FDA类I(即最严重的)医疗设备召回,突出了召回报告系统的缺点,并提出了改进建议。三大召回原因是:“包装”(47.4%),“组件”问题(14%)和“设计”(13.3%)。大约40%的召回事件具有错误特征或暧昧的“FDA确定的原因”。九十四家公司与召回和大多数(78%)的召回事件有关,其中召回了美国总部的公司。三十四家公司(36%)已获得或是另一家的子公司。结果还产生了改进的建议。原因分类方案需要修订,并且可能有一个以上的分类方案的情况。具体而言,“设备设计”原因指定与“组件质量”问题混淆。 “其他”,“未知”和“正在调查”的名称应替换为实际原因确定。应检查“良好的制造实践(GMP)”的有效性以及合并和收购(并购)对设备质量的影响。设计“召回严重程度措施”并改善和标准化召回数据库是其他重要问题。结果和建议也可能持有其他司法管辖区的课程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号