首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical engineering & technology >Non-invasive determination of effective pulmonary blood flow: Evaluation of a simplified rebreathing method.
【24h】

Non-invasive determination of effective pulmonary blood flow: Evaluation of a simplified rebreathing method.

机译:无侵袭性测定有效的肺血流:简化剥离方法的评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Primary objective: To evaluate a new technical approach to measuring effective pulmonary blood flow (PBF) in mechanically ventilated patients. Research design: Prospective clinical study; evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility. Methods: Effective pulmonary blood flow was determined non-invasively in 32 mechanically ventilated patients by using a new rebreathing system (PBF(rb)). Cardiac output corrected for intrapulmonary shunt was taken as reference value (PBF(thd)). Bias, precision and reproducibility of the rebreathing method were calculated from duplicate measurements in each patient. Main results: The mean difference between PBF(rb) and PBF(thd) was - 0.67 +/- 0.83 l min(-1). The mean difference between duplicate measurements with the rebreathing system was 0.16 +/- 0.36 l min(-1). However, the accuracy of the rebreathing system tended to decrease in patients with PBF levels greater than 6 l min(-1). Conclusions: The new device appears to be reliable for determination of PBF values below 6 l min(-1). With this limitation, the present method may be used as a trend-indicator of PBF in mechanically ventilated patients.
机译:主要目标:评估机械通风患者中测量有效肺血流(PBF)的新技术方法。研究设计:前瞻性临床研究;评估准确性和再现性。方法:通过使用新的剥离系统(PBF(RB)),在32名机械通风患者中无侵入性地确定有效的肺血流。校正用于脑内分流的心输出作为参考值(PBF(THD))。释放方法的偏置,精度和再现性从每位患者的重复测量计算。主要结果:PBF(RB)和PBF(THD)之间的平均差异为-0.67 +/- 0.83 L min(-1)。用储存系统重复测量的平均差异为0.16 +/- 0.36L min(-1)。然而,释放系统的准确性倾向于降低PBF水平大于6L min(-1)的患者。结论:新装置似乎可靠地测定6 L min以下的PBF值(-1)。通过这种限制,本方法可以用作机械通风患者中PBF的趋势指示剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号