首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Macroeconomics >Has macroeconomic forecasting changed after the Great Recession? Panel-based evidence on forecast accuracy and forecaster behavior from Germany
【24h】

Has macroeconomic forecasting changed after the Great Recession? Panel-based evidence on forecast accuracy and forecaster behavior from Germany

机译:宏观经济经济衰退后有宏观经济预测发生变化吗? 基于面板的德国预测准确性和预测行为的基于面板的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We analyze the forecast accuracy for the periods before and after the Great Recession using a panel of annual data for 17 growth and inflation forecasts from 14 German institutions. We find only small differences in the quantitative accuracy measures between the two periods. The qualitative measures of forecast accuracy have slightly worsened and forecasters' behavior has changed after the crisis. Errors in predicting directional change, however, have changed significantly between the two periods under investigation. Tests for the efficiency of the forecasts over the entire sample indicate that growth and inflation forecasts are inefficient. We find a changed correlation between forecast errors of inflation and growth after the crisis, which might hint at a changed forecaster behavior. The estimated loss functions before and after the crisis support this interpretation, suggesting a stronger incentive to avoid overestimation of growth and underestimation of inflation after the crisis. Estimating loss functions for a 10-year rolling window also reveal shifts in the level and direction of loss asymmetry.
机译:我们使用17个德国机构的17个生长和通胀预测,分析了巨额经济衰退前后的预测准确性。我们发现两个时期之间的定量准确度措施的小差异。预测准确性的定性措施略微恶化,危机后的预测行为已经发生了变化。然而,在调查的两个时期之间预测定向变化的错误发生了显着变化。对整个样本的预测效率的测试表明,增长和通胀预测效率低下。我们发现危机后通胀和增长的预测误差之间的相关性,这可能会在改变的预测行为中提示。危机支撑此解释之前和之后的估计损失职能,表明避免危机后避免高估增长和低估通胀的更强的激励。 10年滚动窗口的估算损失功能也揭示了损失不对称的水平和方向的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号