...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology: an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing >Incidence and predictors of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy with comparison between apical and non-apical right ventricular pacing sites
【24h】

Incidence and predictors of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy with comparison between apical and non-apical right ventricular pacing sites

机译:起搏器诱导的心肌病的发病率和预测因子与顶端和非顶端右心室起搏位点的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Asynchronous activation of left ventricle (LV) due to chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing has been known to predispose to LV dysfunction. The predictors of LV dysfunction remain to be prospectively studied. This study was designed to follow up patients with RV pacing to look for development of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PiCMP), identify its predictors and draw comparison between apical vs non-apical RV pacing sites. Methods Three hundred sixty-three patients undergoing dual-chamber and single-chamber ventricular implants were enrolled and followed up. Baseline clinical parameters; paced QRS duration and axis; RV lead position by fluoroscopy; LV ejection fraction (LVEF) by Simpson's method on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE); intraventricular dyssynchrony (septal-posterior wall contraction delay) and interventricular dyssynchrony (aortopulmonary ejection delay) on TTE were recorded. The patients were followed up at 6-12 monthly interval with estimation of LVEF and pacemaker interrogation at each visit. Pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy (PiCMP) was defined as a fall in ejection fraction of 10% as compared to the baseline LVEF. Patients developing PiCMP were compared to other patients to identify predictors. Results The mean age of study population was 59.8 years, 68.3% being males. Fifty-one percent and 49% patients underwent VVIR and DDDR pacemaker implantation, respectively. After attrition, 254 patients were analysed. PiCMP developed in 35 patients (13.8%) over a mean follow-up of 14.5 months. After multivariate analysis, burden of ventricular pacing > 60% [HR 4.26, p = 0.004] and interventricular dyssynchrony (aortopulmonary ejection delay > 40 msec) [HR 3.15, p = 0.002] were identified as predictors for PiCMP in patients undergoing chronic RV pacing. There was no effect of RV pacing site (apical vs non-apical) on incidence of PiCMP [HR 1.44, p = 0.353). Conclusions Incidence of PiCMP with RV pacing was found to be 13.8% over a mean follow-up of 14.5 months. Burden of right ventricular pacing and interventricular dyssynchrony were identified as the most important predictors for the development of PiCMP. Non-apical RV pacing site did not offer any benefit in terms of incidence of PiCMP over apical lead position.
机译:由于慢性右心室(RV)起搏,因此已知左心室(LV)的异步激活是已知对LV功能障碍的影响。 LV功能障碍的预测因子仍然是预期研究的。本研究旨在跟进RV起搏的患者寻找起搏诱导的心肌病(PICMP)的发展,确定其预测因子并在顶端VS非顶端RV起搏位点之间的比较。方法注册了三百六十三名经历双室和单室心室植入物的患者。基线临床参数;节奏QRS持续时间和轴;透视荧光透视铅位置; SIMPSON在Transthoracic超声心动图(TTE)上的LV喷射分数(LVEF);记录了TTE上的脑室腹腔腹腔血清(隔膜后壁收缩延迟)和间隔缺血(主动脉粥样硬化延迟)。随访6-12个月间隔,每次访问估算LVEF和起搏器询问。与基线LVEF相比,起搏器诱导的心肌病(PICMP)被定义为射血分数10%的下降。将PICMP的患者与其他患者进行比较,以识别预测因子。结果学习人口的平均年龄为59.8岁,68.3%是男性。百分之五十二和49%的患者分别接受了VVIR和DDDR起搏器植入。消耗后,分析了254名患者。 PICMP在35名患者中开发(13.8%),平均随访14.5个月。在多变量分析后,室起搏的负担> 60%[HR 4.26,P = 0.004]和间歇性呼吸困难(主动脉喷射延迟> 40毫秒)[HR 3.15,P = 0.002]被鉴定为接受慢性RV起搏的患者的PICMP的预测因子。 RV起搏位点(顶端VS非顶端)对PICMP的发生率没有影响[HR 1.44,P = 0.353)。结论PICMP与RV起搏的发生率为13.8%,平均随访14.5个月。右心室起搏和间歇性失育紊乱的负担被确定为PICMP发展的最重要的预测因子。非顶端式RV起搏器在PICMP的发病率上没有提供任何益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号