首页> 外文期刊>Journal of information ethics >Crowd-Sourced Science: Societal Engagement, Scientific Authority and Ethical Practice
【24h】

Crowd-Sourced Science: Societal Engagement, Scientific Authority and Ethical Practice

机译:人群源科学:社会参与,科学权威和道德实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper discusses the implications for public participation in science opened by the sharing of information via electronic media. The ethical dimensions of information flow and control are linked to questions of autonomy, authority, and appropriate exploitation of knowledge. It argues that, by lowering the boundaries that limit access and participation by wider active audiences, both scientific identity and practice are challenged in favor of extra-disciplinary and avocational communities such as scientific enthusiasts and lay experts. Reconfigurations of hierarchy, mediated by new channels of information flow, are increasingly visible at the interface between professional and non-professional practice. Setting the scene by surveying the role of the media in defining twentieth-century contexts of lay science, the paper illustrates the appropriation and recuperation of scientific authority being played out in two contemporary models of active public engagement: so-called "citizen science" and varieties of "crowd-sourced science." Both participatory models are increasingly reliant on information exchange via social media, but may be implemented to support distinctly different societal goals and beneficiaries.
机译:本文讨论了通过电子媒体分享信息共享的公众参与科学的影响。信息流量和控制的道德尺寸与自主,权威和对知识的适当开发问题有关。它认为,通过降低更广泛的积极受众的访问和参与的边界,科学的身份和实践都受到挑战,有利于科学爱好者和专家等额外的纪律和自传社区。由新信息流渠道介导的层次结构的重新配置在专业和非专业实践之间的界面中越来越可见。通过测量媒体在定义第十四世纪的小型科学背景下的媒体作用来设置现场,说明了科学管理局的拨款和恢复在两种当代的积极公众参与模型中,所谓的“公民科学”和品种“人群源科学”。参与式模型越来越依赖于社交媒体信息交流,但可以实施以支持明显不同的社会目标和受益人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号