首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hospice and palliative nursing: JHPN : the official journal of the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association >Development and Validity of the Nursing Care Scale and Nurse's Difficulty Scale in Caring for Dying Patients With Cancer and Their Families in General Hospitals in Japan
【24h】

Development and Validity of the Nursing Care Scale and Nurse's Difficulty Scale in Caring for Dying Patients With Cancer and Their Families in General Hospitals in Japan

机译:护理规模的开发和有效性和护士在日本综合医院患有癌症及其家庭的关注患者的关注

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study develops and examines the validity and reliability of 2 scales, respectively, for evaluating nursing care and the experience of difficulties providing nursing care for dying patients with cancer and their families. A cross-sectional anonymous questionnaire was administered to nursing staff caring for dying patients with cancer and their families in 4 general hospitals and a university hospital in Japan. The instruments assessed were the Nursing Care Scale for Dying Patients and Their Families (NCD) and the Nurse's Difficulty Scale for Dying Patients and Their Families (NDD). Of the 497 questionnaires sent to nurses, 401 responses (80%) were analyzed. Factor analyses revealed that the NCD and NDD consisted of 12 items with 4 subscales: "symptom management," "reassessment of current treatment and nursing care," "explanation to family," and "respect for the patient and family's dignity before and after death." These scales had sufficient convergent and discriminative validity, sufficient internal consistency (alpha of subscales: NCD, 0.71-0.87; NDD, 0.74-0.93), and sufficient test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient of subscales: NCD, 0.59-0.81; NDD, 0.67-0.82) to be used as self-assessments and evaluation tools in education programs to improve the quality of nursing care for the dying patients and their families.
机译:本研究开发和检查了2级的有效性和可靠性,分别为评估护理护理以及为患有癌症和家庭患者的患者提供护理的困难的经验。横断面匿名调查问卷由在4名综合医院和日本的大学医院进行治疗患有癌症及其家庭的护理患者。评估的仪器是染色患者及其家庭(NCD)的护理规模,以及护士难以死于患者及其家庭(NDD)的难度规模。在向护士发送的497份问卷中,分析了401份反应(80%)。因素分析表明,NCD和NDD由12个项目组成,其中12个项目有4个分量:“症状管理”,“对当前的治疗和护理重新评估”,“对家庭的解释”和“尊重患者和家庭死亡之后的尊严” 。“这些尺度具有足够的会聚和辨别有效性,充足的内部一致性(分量的α:NCD,0.71-0.87; NDD,0.74-0.93)和足够的测试 - 保持可靠性(分量的脑内相关系数:NCD,0.59-0.81; NDD ,0.67-0.82)将其用作教育计划中的自我评估和评估工具,以提高垂死患者及其家庭的护理质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号