首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition >Produce price savings for consumers at farmers' markets compared to supermarkets in North Carolina.
【24h】

Produce price savings for consumers at farmers' markets compared to supermarkets in North Carolina.

机译:与北卡罗来纳州的超市相比,为农民市场的消费者提供价格储蓄。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One barrier to fruit and vegetable consumption is financial cost, especially among low-income populations. This study aimed to conduct a price comparison of produce in supermarkets and farmers' markets in 12 North Carolina counties to identify which food venue offers fruits and vegetables at the lowest financial cost. Farmers' market and supermarket produce prices were systematically compared in a purposive sample of 12 county markets. Prices of the same produce items at each venue were compared using t-tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA). There was a mean price saving of +17.9% at farmers' markets among all produce items (n = 230). There was a significant difference in produce price savings by county (P = 0.0477) and item (P = 0.0002). In most counties examined, there was a price saving to consumers at farmers' markets compared to supermarkets. Future research should examine produce prices in a larger sample of farmers' markets and supermarkets.
机译:果实和蔬菜消费的一个障碍是财务成本,特别是低收入人口。 本研究旨在在北卡罗来纳州12个北卡罗来纳州的超市和农民市场的价格比较,以确定哪些食物场地以最低的财务成本提供水果和蔬菜。 农民市场和超市在12个县市场的目的地进行了系统地提供了价格。 使用T检验和方差分析(ANOVA)进行比较每个场地的同一产品的价格。 在所有生产项目中,农民市场上的平均价格为+ 17.9%( n = 230)。 县( P = 0.0477)和物品( p = 0.0002),存在显着差异。 在大多数审查的县,与超市相比,农民市场的消费者为消费者节省了一个价格。 未来的研究应检查在更大的农民市场和超市中的产品价格。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号