首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hand therapy: Official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists >The short-term effects of hot packs vs therapeutic whirlpool on active wrist range of motion for patients with distal radius fracture: A randomized controlled trial
【24h】

The short-term effects of hot packs vs therapeutic whirlpool on active wrist range of motion for patients with distal radius fracture: A randomized controlled trial

机译:热包的短期效应与远端半径骨折患者的活性腕部运动范围内的治疗性旋涡:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Study DesignBlinded randomized controlled trial. IntroductionIt is generally accepted that heat is beneficial for improving range of motion (ROM). However, the mechanism of action is not clearly understood, and the optimal method of heat application has not been established. Purpose of the StudyTo investigate the immediate effects of using a moist hot pack (MHP) vs therapeutic whirlpool bath (WB) for improving wrist ROM during a therapy session for patients with distal radius fracture. MethodsAbout 60 adult patients, with a mean age of 54 years in the MHP group and 53 years in the WB group, with healed distal radius fracture were randomized into 2 groups of 30. Patients in group 1 were placed in an MHP for 15 minutes during therapy. Patients in group 2 had their arm placed in a WB and were asked to perform active wrist ROM exercises for the same period. This occurred for 3 consecutive therapy visits, with wrist and forearm ROM being measured before and after heat during each visit. ResultsThe multivariate analysis of variance demonstrated that the canonical variate for ROM was significantly different between groups (F[6,53]?= 6.01;P< .05), indicating that patients in the WB group had a significantly larger increase in ROM than patients receiving MHP application. DiscussionBoth WB and MHP improved wrist ROM during therapy sessions in this study, making both these acceptable options for clinical use when the goal is to precondition a patient for other treatments. ConclusionsIndividuals who received WB showed a statistically greater increase in wrist ROM than those receiving MHP during a therapy session, although the difference between groups may or may not be clinically important considering the small changes in ROM observed in this study. Level of EvidenceLevel II.
机译:研究设计为随机对照试验。介绍通常被认为是改善运动范围(ROM)的有益。然而,不清楚不清楚的作用机制,并且尚未建立热应用的最佳方法。该研究的目的研究使用潮湿的热包(MHP)VS治疗漩涡浴(WB)在远端半径骨折患者期间使用潮湿的热包(MHP)VS治疗漩涡浴(WB)来改善腕带。方法60例成年患者,在MHP组和WB组中为54岁的平均年龄为54岁,用愈合的远端半径骨折随机分为2组30.第1组患者在MHP中置于MHP中15分钟治疗。第2组的患者他们的手臂放在WB中,并被要求在同一时期进行积极的手腕ROM练习。这发生了3次连续治疗,手腕和前臂ROM在每次访问期间在热量之前和之后测量。结果的变异性分析表明,rOM的规范变化在组之间显着差异(f [6,53]?= 6.01; p <.05),表明WB组中的患者比患者显着增加。接收MHP应用程序。讨论过程WB和MHP改良腕部在本研究中的治疗期间,当目标是对其他治疗的前提下,临床使用的这些可接受的选择。结论在治疗会议期间,收到WB的IdionsIces在腕表上的统计学上增加了腕表,但群体之间的差异可能在临床上很重要,考虑到本研究中观察到的ROM的小变化。 Evidencelevel II的水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号