...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of forensic sciences. >Weapon Use in Korean Homicide: Differences Between Homicides Involving Sharp and Blunt Instruments
【24h】

Weapon Use in Korean Homicide: Differences Between Homicides Involving Sharp and Blunt Instruments

机译:韩国杀人的武器用途:涉及锋利的刺激物的杀菌差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract On the basis of information regarding 276 homicides committed in South Korea between 1987 and 2008, we compared offenders’ and victims’ characteristics, injury locations, weapon‐related behavior, and offending behavior between homicides involving sharp and blunt instruments. The victims of sharp‐force homicide were much younger relative to those of blunt‐force homicide. In addition, homicides involving blunt instruments were more likely to be committed by offenders who lived with the victims. Most sharp‐force homicides involved injuries to the torso, while blunt‐force homicides involved mainly head injuries. Furthermore, perpetrators of sharp‐force homicides tended to preselect their weapons, while those of blunt‐force homicides were likely to use weapons of opportunity. Logistic regression analysis identified a number of factors, including injury location and body transportation, which significantly predicted weapon type. As this was the first South Korean study to compare sharp‐ and blunt‐force homicides, the results have practical implications for homicide investigations.
机译:摘要基于1987年至2008年韩国犯下的276名凶手的信息,我们比较了罪犯和受害者的特征,伤害地点,武器相关的行为以及涉及锋利和钝器的凶杀案之间的冒犯行为。锐利的凶杀案的受害者相对于钝性凶杀案的较年轻程度。此外,涉及钝器的凶杀案更有可能被违法者与受害者一起生活。大多数锋利的凶杀案涉及躯干的伤害,而钝性凶杀案主要涉及头部伤害。此外,急性凶杀案的肇事者往往预定武器,而钝性凶杀案的人可能会使用机会的武器。 Logistic回归分析确定了许多因素,包括伤害位置和身体运输,其显着预测武器类型。正如这是第一个比较尖锐和钝性凶杀症的韩国研究,结果对杀人性调查具有实际影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号