...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of forensic sciences. >Using Named Entities for Computer‐Automated Verbal Deception Detection
【24h】

Using Named Entities for Computer‐Automated Verbal Deception Detection

机译:使用命名实体进行计算机自动的口头欺骗检测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract There is an increasing demand for automated verbal deception detection systems. We propose named entity recognition ( NER ; i.e., the automatic identification and extraction of information from text) to model three established theoretical principles: (i) truth tellers provide accounts that are richer in detail, (ii) contain more contextual references (specific persons, locations, and times), and (iii) deceivers tend to withhold potentially checkable information. We test whether NER captures these theoretical concepts and can automatically identify truthful versus deceptive hotel reviews. We extracted the proportion of named entities with two NER tools (spaCy and Stanford's NER ) and compared the discriminative ability to a lexicon word count approach ( LIWC ) and a measure of sentence specificity (speciteller). Named entities discriminated truthful from deceptive hotel reviews above chance level, and outperformed the lexicon approach and sentence specificity. This investigation suggests that named entities may be a useful addition to existing automated verbal deception detection approaches.
机译:摘要对自动言语欺骗检测系统的需求越来越大。我们提出命名实体识别(即,从文本中自动识别和提取信息)到模型三个建立的理论原则:(i)真实的攻击者提供详细富裕的帐户,(ii)包含更多的上下文参考(具体人员,地点和时间)和(iii)欺骗倾向于抵押潜在的可检测信息。我们测试Ner是否捕获这些理论概念,并可以自动识别真实的与欺骗式酒店评论。我们用两个网上工具(Spacy和Stanford的Ner)提取了命名实体的比例,并将歧视能力与词典字数(LIWC)和句子特异性的衡量标准进行了比较。命名实体歧视欺骗宾馆的真实宾馆评论以上机会级别,优于词汇方法和句子特异性。本研究表明,命名实体可能是现有自动言语欺骗检测方法的有用补充。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号