首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition >'A Cruel King' Is Not the Same as 'A King Who Is Cruel': Modifier Position Affects How Words Are Encoded and Retrieved From Memory
【24h】

'A Cruel King' Is Not the Same as 'A King Who Is Cruel': Modifier Position Affects How Words Are Encoded and Retrieved From Memory

机译:“一个残酷的国王”与“一个残忍的国王”不一样:修饰者立场会影响如何从内存编码和检索单词

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We examined whether the position of modifiers in English influences how words are encoded and subsequently retrieved from memory. Compared with premodifiers, postmodifiers might confer more perceptual significance to the associated head nouns, are more consistent with the "given-before-new" information structure, and might also be easier to integrate because the head noun is available before the modifications are encountered. In 4 experiments, we investigated whether premodified (the cruel and merciless king), and postmodified (the king who was cruel and merciless) noun phrases (henceforth, NPs) could induce variations in ease of subsequent retrieval. In Experiments 1, 2, and 3, participants used more pronouns (he), as opposed to full descriptions (the king) to refer to postmodified NPs than to unmodified competitors. but pronominal reference to premodified NPs and unmodified competitors did not differ, suggesting that postmodified NPs are more accessible in memory. When the data from all 3 experiments were combined, we also observed significantly more pronominal reference to post- than to premodified NPs, as well as a greater increase in pronominal reference rates between postmodified NPs and unmodified competitors than between premodified NPs and unmodified competitors. In Experiment 4, words following critical pronouns were read faster when the pronouns referred to modified than to unmodified NPs, and also when the pronouns referred to post- rather than premodified NPs. Taken together, our results show enhanced retrieval facilitation for postmodified NPs compared with premodified NPs. These results arc the first to demonstrate that the linear position of modifications results in measurable processing cost at a subsequent point. The results have important implications for memory-based theories of language processing, and also for theories assigning a central role for discourse status and information structure during sentence processing.
机译:我们检查了英语中修饰符的位置是否会影响单词如何编码并随后从内存中检索。与Premodifiers相比,后修整器可能会赋予相关的头部名词更具感知性,与“新的新”信息结构更加一致,并且可能更容易集成,因为在遇到修改之前,头部名词可用。在4个实验中,我们调查了原始的(残酷和无情的王)和后制定的(被残酷而无情的国王)名词短语(从此,NPS)可以促进随后的检索方便的变化。在实验1,2和3中,参与者使用了更多代词(他),而不是完整的描述(国王),以指的是被修改的NPS而不是未经修改的竞争对手。但是对原始的NP和未修改的竞争对手的合并参考没有差异,表明在内存中更易于拨打的NPS。当组合来自所有3个实验的数据时,我们还观察到对原始的NPS后的多种分批参考,并且在被初始化的NPS和未修改的竞争对手之间比较多样化的竞争对手之间的合成率更大增加。在实验4中,当代词被修改的代词比未修改的NPS称为未改性的NPS时,读取临界代词之后的单词,以及当代词引用的代词而不是原始的NPS。与原始的NPS相比,我们的结果表明,对被初稿NP的检索促进提供了增强的检索促进。这些结果首先赋予修改的线性位置在后续点导致可测量的处理成本。结果对语言处理的基于记忆的理论以及在句子处理期间为话语状态和信息结构分配核心作用的理论具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号