首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Experimental Psychology. General >Common and Specific Loci of Stroop Effects in Vocal and Manual Tasks, Revealed by Event-Related Brain Potentials and Posthypnotic Suggestions
【24h】

Common and Specific Loci of Stroop Effects in Vocal and Manual Tasks, Revealed by Event-Related Brain Potentials and Posthypnotic Suggestions

机译:声乐和手动任务中的共同和特定基因座,通过事件相关的大脑潜力和突显建议揭示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the Stroop task color words are shown in various print colors. When print colors are named or classified with button presses, interference occurs if word meaning is color-incongruent and facilitation if it is congruent. Although the Stroop effects in vocal and manual task versions are similar, it is unclear whether the underlying mechanisms are equivalent. We addressed this question by (a) recording event-related brain potentials (ERPs), (b) manipulating the lexicality of neutral stimuli, and (c) giving posthypnotic suggestions (PHS) that written words would lose their meaning. The Stroop effect in the vocal version was twice its manual counterpart. PHS strongly reduced both effects by a similar amount, supporting a common semantic locus during reading. Task- and hypnosis-invariant lexicality effects for neutral words ruled out presemantic reading loci. Articulation-artifact corrected ERPs showed task-invariant Stroop effects in N400 amplitudes, supporting similar semantic loci. However, in the vocal task response-locked ERPs indicated a task-specific Stroop effect over left-inferior frontal and parietal scalp sites, suggesting interference during word production. Interestingly, PHS increased the N1 and decreased the N2 components in ERPs, regardless of congruency, indicating enhanced proactive executive control and diminished demands on conflict-monitoring, respectively. Stroop effects in the N400 were reduced by PHS, confirming their semantic locus. In conclusion, vocal and manual Stroop versions seem to share semantic loci of conflict. The bigger vocal Stroop effect may be attributable to additional loci during word production lexicon. Apparently, PHS diminish Stroop effects by enhancing proactive executive control over lexico-semantic conflicts.
机译:在Tlup任务中,颜色单词以各种打印颜色显示。当打印颜色被命名或分类按钮按下时,如果单词含义是颜色 - 不一致的,则会发生干扰,如果是一致,则会促进。虽然声音和手动任务版本中的速率效果类似,但目前尚不清楚底层机制是否等效。我们通过(a)记录了这个问题(a)记录与事件相关的大脑潜力(ERP),(b)操纵中性刺激的词汇性,(c)给出书面言论(phs)的突出表明会失去意义。声乐版中的Troop效果是其手动对应的两倍。 PHS通过类似的数量强烈减少了两种影响,在读数期间支持普通的语义基因座。任务 - 催眠和催眠 - 不变性的中性词汇排除了超意的阅读基因座。铰接工件校正ERPS在N400幅度中显示出任务不变的速率效应,支持类似的语义基因座。然而,在声乐任务中,锁定锁定的ERP表示在左下额前和Parietal头皮网站上的任务特定的Tloop效果,暗示在Word生产过程中干扰。有趣的是,PHS增加了N1并减少了ERPS中的N2组分,无论一致,指示分别提高主动执行控制和对冲突监测的需求减少。 N400中的速率效应通过pHs降低,确认它们的语义基因座。总之,声乐和手动排行版本似乎分享了冲突的语义基因座。在Word Production Lexicon期间,更大的声音效果可能是额外的基因座。显然,PHS通过加强对词汇语义冲突的主动执行控制来削弱速率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号