首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning >Interpretive Affinities: The Constitutionalization of Rights of Nature, Pacha Mama, in Ecuador
【24h】

Interpretive Affinities: The Constitutionalization of Rights of Nature, Pacha Mama, in Ecuador

机译:解释亲和力:自然权利的宪政,厄瓜多尔帕萨妈妈

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 2008, Ecuador adopted the world's first constitution recognizing the rights of nature. The status of nature was redefined to enable, ideally, legal interventions to protect ecosystems. This article examines the process through which rights of nature entered the Ecuadorian context by contextualizing the campaign to mobilize support for these constitutional changes launched by Fundacion Pachamama, a nongovernmental organization close to indigenous and environmental movements. The collective action forms involved in the constitutionalization of rights of nature are approached as sites of knowledge production and contestation. Concepts from the sociology of knowledge approach to discourse are applied to reconstruct the interpretive repertoires of rights of nature advocates, a faction of the indigenous movement and the environmental movement during the constitutional reform. This analysis reveals that interpretive affinities or resemblances among the interpretive repertoires of rights of nature advocates and indigenous and environmental movements shaped and enabled the advocacy for rights of nature. Moreover, the article demonstrates that throughout the debates at the Constituent Assembly, the concept of rights of nature was stitched onto a discursive context imprinted with nationalist feelings underpinning a critique of neo-liberalism, and aspirations for legal progress and the decolonization of society.
机译:2008年,厄瓜多尔通过了世界上第一批认识到自然权利的宪法。自然状态被重新定义,理想地,法律干预措施来保护生态系统。本文介绍了自然权利,通过上下文化旨在动员基金会帕卡马马队推出的宪法变革,临近土着和环境运动的非政府组织的宪法变革,对厄瓜多尔的环境进入厄瓜多尔语境的过程。涉及自然权利宪法化的集体行动表格被视为知识生产和争议的网站。知识方法社会学的概念适用于重建自然倡导者权利的解释性曲目,是宪法改革中的土着运动的派系和环境运动。该分析揭示了自然倡导者和土着和环境运动的解释性曲目中的解释性亲和力或相似性,并使其具有自然权利的宣传。此外,本文表明,在整个组成集会中的辩论中,自然权利的概念被缝合到印记的话语中,被限制为基于新自由主义的批判,以及法律进步和社会非殖民化的愿望和社会的非殖民化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号