首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Engineering >Influence of Model Parameters and Inlet Turbulence Boundary Specification Methods in Secondary Settling Tanks: Computational Fluid Dynamics Study
【24h】

Influence of Model Parameters and Inlet Turbulence Boundary Specification Methods in Secondary Settling Tanks: Computational Fluid Dynamics Study

机译:模型参数和入口湍流边界规格方法在二级沉降箱中的影响:计算流体动力学研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been applied in secondary settling tank (SST) analysis for more than 30 years. Although great progresses has been achieved, there are still some uncertainties in CFD SST modeling. In this study, a numerical model is used to understand the effects of two model parameters: rp, accounting for particles with poor settling properties in the Takacs settling model; and rho p, the dry solids density. Both parameters are used in the user-defined functions to couple solids transport on settling velocity. Also, the differences in turbulence specification methods in prediction of SST performance are evaluated. The results show that the prediction of effluent suspended solids (ESS) is very sensitive to rp. The incorrect specification of rp may mask real improvements in SST geometry, and may even cause clarification failure prediction under the normal inflow conditions. The value of rho p has less impact on ESS prediction, and its specification is less critical to maintain ESS prediction consistently with field data. Neither return activated sludge concentration (RAS) nor sludge blanket height (SBH) is sensitive to the effects of rp and rho p. Additionally, the initial turbulent kinetic energy and turbulent dissipation rate specification methods produce only local effects on the hydrodynamics near the inlet boundary, and none of the performance indicators (ESS, RAS, or SBH) are sensitive to inlet boundary turbulence specification methods.
机译:计算流体动力学(CFD)已应用于二次沉降罐(SST)分析超过30年。虽然已经实现了巨大的进展,但仍然存在CFD SST建模中的一些不确定性。在这项研究中,使用数值模型来了解两个模型参数的影响:RP,核对TAGACS沉降模型中沉降性质差的颗粒;和rho p,干燥的固体密度。两个参数用于用户定义的函数中,以将固体传输耦合在稳定的速度上。而且,评估了在SST性能预测中的湍流规范方法的差异。结果表明,流出物悬浮固体(ESS)的预测对RP非常敏感。 RP的错误规范可能在SST几何体中掩盖真正的改进,甚至可能在正常流入条件下引起澄清故障预测。 RHO P的值对ESS预测的影响较小,其规范对维护ESS预测的规范不太重要,与现场数据保持一致。返回活性污泥浓度(RAS)也不是污泥毯高度(SBH)对RP和RHO P的影响敏感。另外,初始湍流动能和湍流耗散速率规范方法仅对入口边界附近的流体动力学产生局部效应,并且均不敏感地对入口边界湍流规范方法敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号