首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >Cytotoxicity of GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow2, MTA Fillapex, and AH Plus on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells
【24h】

Cytotoxicity of GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow2, MTA Fillapex, and AH Plus on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells

机译:Guttaflow Bioseal,Guttaflow2,MTA Fillapex和αh加上的细胞毒性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the in vitro cytotoxicity of endodontic sealers (GuttaFlow Bioseal, GuttaFlow2, and MTA Fillapex) on human periodontal ligament stem cells (hPDLSCs). As a reference, AH Plus was compared with the more recent endodontic sealers regarding cell viability and cell attachment. Methods: Biological testing was carried out in vitro on hPDLSCs. Cell viability assay was performed by using eluates from each endodontic sealer. To assess cell morphology and attachment to the different sealers, the hPDLSCs were directly seeded onto the material surfaces and analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. Chemical composition of the sealers was determined by energy-dispersive x-ray, and eluates were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Statistical differences were assessed by analysis of variance and Tukey test (p < .05). Results: Cell viability was evident after 24 hours in the presence of GuttaFlow Bioseal and GuttaFlow 2 but not in the case of AH Plus or MTA Fillapex. At 168 hours, GuttaFlow Bioseal and GuttaFlow 2 exhibited high and moderate cell viability, respectively, whereas AH Plus and MTA Fillapex revealed low rates of cell cell viability (P < .001). Finally, scanning electron microscopy studies revealed a high degree of proliferation, cell spreading, and attachment, especially when using GuttaFlow Bioseal disks. Conclusions: GuttaFlow Bioseal and GuttaFlow2 showed lower cytotoxicity than MTA Fillapex and AH plus. Further in vitro and in vivo investigations are required to confirm the suitability of GuttaFlow Bioseal for clinical application.
机译:简介:本研究的目的是评估人牙周韧带干细胞(HPDLSCs)脊髓封闭剂(Guttaflow Bioseal,Guttaflow2和MTA Fillapex)的体外细胞毒性。作为参考,与关于细胞活力和细胞附着的更近期的牙髓密封剂进行比较。方法:生物检测在HPDLSC上进行体外进行。通过使用来自每个牙髓密封剂的洗脱液进行细胞活力测定。为了评估细胞形态和附着到不同的密封剂,将HPDLSC直接接种到材料表面上并通过扫描电子显微镜进行分析。通过能量分散X射线测定密封剂的化学成分,通过电感耦合等离子体质谱法分析洗脱液。通过分析方差和Tukey试验评估统计差异(P <.05)。结果:在Guttaflow生物膜和Guttaflow 2的存在下24小时后,细胞活力在αHlus或MTA Fillapex的情况下发生了24小时后显而易见。在168小时内,Guttaflow生物膜和Guttaflow 2分别表现出高和中等的细胞活力,而AH Plus和MTA钙普克Xex显示出低速率的细胞活力(P <.001)。最后,扫描电子显微镜研究显示出高度的增殖,细胞扩散和附着,特别是在使用Guttaflow生物骨盘时。结论:Guttaflow Bioseal和Guttaflow2表现出比MTA Fillapex和AH Plus的细胞毒性更低。进一步在体外和体内调查需要确认Guttaflow生物骨髓对临床应用的适用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号