首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists >A Quantitative Angiographic Comparison of Restenotic Tissue Following Placement of Drug-Eluting Stents and Bare Metal Stents in Symptomatic Patients With Femoropopliteal Disease
【24h】

A Quantitative Angiographic Comparison of Restenotic Tissue Following Placement of Drug-Eluting Stents and Bare Metal Stents in Symptomatic Patients With Femoropopliteal Disease

机译:股骨质疾病症状患者在症状患者中放置药物洗脱支架和裸金属支架后的定量血管造影比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate the patterns of in-stent restenosis (ISR) within femoropopliteal bare metal stents (BMS) and drugeluting stents (DES) as determined by quantitative angiographic analysis. Methods: Utilizing results from independent core laboratory angiographic imaging analysis, quantitative assessment of the restenotic tissue burden was evaluated in 33 patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal ISR, including 20 lesions in 19 patients (mean age 71.5 +/- 8.1 years; 11 men) treated with DES and 14 lesions in 14 patients (mean age 70.6 +/- 9.2 years; 9 men) treated with BMS. Results: The average time to target lesion revascularization was similar (8.7 months) for the DES and BMS groups. The DES group had significantly less recurrent disease burden (17.1%) compared with the BMS group (27.8%, p=0.03), representing a 39% relative reduction. Conclusion: Reduced restenotic tissue after endovascular intervention is associated with improved hemodynamics and fewer clinical symptoms and may explain the reduced need for reintervention in restenotic lesions initially treated with DES as compared with BMS. Further study of treatment failure modes may lead to improved device selection criteria to treat patients with peripheral artery disease.
机译:目的:通过定量血管造影分析测定股骨质上裸晶支架(BMS)和解毒支架(DES)中的支架内再狭窄(ISR)的图案。方法:利用独立核心实验室血管造影成像分析的结果,在33例有症状股骨质上的ISR的患者中评估了重新组织负担的定量评估,包括19名患者的20例(平均71.5 +/- 8.1岁; 11名男子)治疗14名患者的DES和14个病变(平均年龄为70.6 +/- 9.2岁; 9人)用BMS处理。结果:DES和BMS组的平均靶向病变血运重建时间相似(8.7个月)。与BMS组相比,DES组具有明显较低的复发性疾病负担(17.1%)(27.8%,P = 0.03),相对减少39%。结论:血管内干预后的再生组织减少与改善的血液动力学和较少的临床症状相关,并且可以解释与BMS相比最初用DES初始治疗的重新入住的重新入养需求减少。进一步研究治疗失效模式可能导致改善的装置选择标准治疗外周动脉疾病的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号