首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical densitometry >Effects of Contrast Enhancement on In-Body Calibrated Phantomless Bone Mineral Density Measurements in Computed Tomography
【24h】

Effects of Contrast Enhancement on In-Body Calibrated Phantomless Bone Mineral Density Measurements in Computed Tomography

机译:对比度增强对体内校准体内骨密度骨密度测量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We aimed to test the potential of phantomless volumetric bone mineral density (PLvBMD) measurements for the determination of volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) in routine contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). We evaluated 56 tri-phasic abdominal computed tomography scans, including an unenhanced scan as well as defined CECT scans in the arterial and portalvenous phase. PLvBMD analysis was performed by 4 radiologists using an FDA-approved tool for phantomless evaluation of bone density (IntelliSpace, Philips, The Netherlands). Mean vBMD of the first 3 lumbar vertebrae in each contrast phase was determined and interobserver variance of vBMD independent of contrast phase was analyzed using intraclass correlation, Bland-Altman plots, and Student'sttest. CECT scans were associated with a significantly higher PLvBMD compared with unenhanced scans (unenhanced computed tomography: 97.8?mg/cc; arterial CECT: 106.3?mg/cc, portalvenous CECT: 106.3?mg/cc). Overall, there was no significant difference of PLvBMD between data acquisition in arterial and portalvenous phases (increase of 8.6% each, standard deviation ratio 37.7%–38.3%). In Bland-Altman analysis, there was no evidence of a relevant reader-related bias or an increase in standard deviation of PLvBMD measurements in contrast-enhanced scans compared with unenhanced scans. The following conversion formulas for unenhanced PLvBMD were determined:unenhancedPLvBMD=0.89×arterialPLvBMD+3,74mg/cc(r2?=?0.94)andunenhancedPLvBMD=0.88×venousPLvBMD+4,56mg/cc(r2?=?0.93). Compared with the results of phantom-based quantitative computed tomography measurements reported in the literature, the PLvBMD changes associated with contrast enhancement were relatively moderate with an increase of 8.6% in average. The time-point of the contrast-enhanced PLvBMD measurements after injection of contrast media did not appear to affect the results. With the adjustment formulas provided in this study, the method can improve osteoporosis screening through detection of reduced bone mass of the vertebrae in routinely conducted CECT.
机译:我们旨在测试常规对比增强计算断层摄影(CECT)中的体积骨密度(VBMD)的体积体积骨密度(PLVBMD)测量的潜力。我们评估了56个三相腹部计算断层扫描扫描,包括未加入扫描以及在动脉和便携式阶段的定义的CECT扫描。 PLVBMD分析由4位放射科医生使用FDA批准的骨密度评估(IntelliSpace,Philips,荷兰)进行FDA批准的工具。在每个对比度相位中,确定每个对比度阶段的前3个腰椎的平均VBMD,并使用脑内相关性,平坦 - altman图和学生的最多独立于对比度阶段的VBMD的interobserver方差。与未加入扫描相比,CECT扫描与一个明显更高的PLVBMD相关联(未加薪计算断层扫描:97.8?MG / CC;动脉CECT:106.3?MG / CC,Portalvenous Cect:106.3?Mg / Cc)。总体而言,动脉和门肛周数据采集之间的PLVBMD没有显着差异(每次增加8.6%,标准差比37.7%-38.3%)。在Bland-Altman分析中,没有证据表明相关读者相关偏差或PLVBMD测量标准偏差的增加与对比增强的扫描相比,与未加薪扫描相比。确定以下转化公式:UNENHANCECHANCEDPLVBMD = 0.89×ARTERIALPLVBMD + 3,74mg / CC(R2?= 0.94)AndUnenhancedplvbmd = 0.88×VenousplvBmd + 4,56mg / cc(R2?= 0.93)。与文献中报道的基于幻像的定量计算断层扫描测量结果相比,与对比度增强相关的PLVBMD变化相对中等,平均增加了8.6%。对比度介质注入后的对比度增强的PLVBMD测量的时间点似乎没有影响结果。通过本研究提供的调节式,该方法可以通过在常规进行CECT中检测椎骨的降低的骨质量来改善骨质疏松症筛查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号