首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical anesthesia >The effect of sevoflurane compared to propofol maintenance on post-surgical quality of recovery in patients undergoing an ambulatory gynecological surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled, clinical trial
【24h】

The effect of sevoflurane compared to propofol maintenance on post-surgical quality of recovery in patients undergoing an ambulatory gynecological surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled, clinical trial

机译:七氟醚对接受动态妇科手术的患者外科恢复后外科恢复的影响:一种预期,随机,双盲,控制,临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Objective The main objective of the current investigation was to evaluate the effect of propofol used as anesthetic maintenance compared to sevoflurane on global post-surgical quality of recovery in female patients undergoing ambulatory gynecological surgery. Design The study was a prospective randomized double blinded, controlled, clinical trial. Interventions Healthy female subjects were randomized to receive propofol or sevoflurane as anesthetic maintenance. Measurements The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery 40 (QOR-40) questionnaire at 24h after surgery. Other data collected included opioid consumption, pain scores and time to hospital discharge. P Main results Ninety subjects were randomized and sixty seven completed the study. Patient's baseline characteristics and surgical factors were not different between study groups. There was not a clinically significant difference in the global QoR-40 scores between the sevoflurane and the propofol groups, median (IQR) of 175 (163 to 181) and 176 (163 to 184), respectively, P =0.97. There was an inverse relationship (ρ=?0.42) between the opioid consumption in PACU (IV morphine equivalents) and 24h postoperative quality of recovery ( P P Conclusions Our current results do not support the use of total intravenous anesthesia as an efficacious strategy to improve global quality of recovery after ambulatory surgery. Opioid consumption in the PACU is an earlier surrogate that can be utilized to identify ambulatory patients with a high likelihood to develop poor global quality of recovery and who may benefit from more efficacious strategies to improve global quality of recovery. Trial registration : ClinicalTrial.gov ; url: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; registration identified: NCT 01755234. Highlights ? The use of propofol as maintenance of anesthesia has been suggested to improve recovery after ambulatory surgery when compared to volatile anesthetics. ? We did not find evidence to determine that propofol is a better choice to improve quality of recovery when compared to sevoflurane. ? Our results suggest that both agents are acceptable as maintenance of anesthesia for ambulatory surgery.
机译:摘要目的目前调查的主要目的是评估异丙酚作为麻醉剂维持的效果与七氟醚对妇女患者患者妇科手术患者的全球外科恢复。设计该研究是一种预期随机双盲,受控,临床试验。干预健康的女性受试者被随机地接受异丙酚或七氟醚作为麻醉剂维护。测量主要结果是24小时后恢复40(QOR-40)问卷的质量。收集的其他数据包括阿片类药物消费,疼痛评分和医院排放时间。 P主要结果九十个受试者随机,六十七完成研究。研究组之间的患者的基线特征和外科因素在不同。七氟醚和异丙酚基团之间的全球QOR-40分数,175(163至181)和176(163至184)的中值(IQR)之间的全局QOR-40分别没有临床显着差异,P = 0.97。在PACU(IV吗啡当量)和24小时术后恢复质量的阿片类药物之间存在反相(ρ= 0.42)(PP结论我们目前的结果不支持使用总静脉麻醉作为改善全球的有效策略汽车手术后的复苏质量。PACU的阿片类药物是较早的代理,可用于识别高可能发展差的难度恢复患者的动态患者,并且可能会受益于改善全球恢复质量的更有效的策略。审判登记:ClinicalTrial.gov;网址:http://www.conicaltrials.gov;标识注册:NCT 01755234.与挥发性麻醉剂相比,使用异丙酚作为麻醉后的恢复。 ?我们没有发现证据确定相比之下的ProPofol是提高恢复质量的更佳选择到七氟醚。还我们的研究结果表明,两种药剂都可以作为气象手术的麻醉维持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号