...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical anesthesia >Modified open-access scheduling for new patient evaluations at an academic chronic pain clinic increased patient access to care, but did not materially reduce their mean cancellation rate: A retrospective, observational study
【24h】

Modified open-access scheduling for new patient evaluations at an academic chronic pain clinic increased patient access to care, but did not materially reduce their mean cancellation rate: A retrospective, observational study

机译:改进的开放式安排调度,用于学术慢性疼痛诊所的新患者评估增加了患者的护理,但没有实质性地减少其平均取消率:回顾性,观察研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Study objective To determine if open-access scheduling would reduce the cancellation rate for new patient evaluations in a chronic pain clinic by at least 50%. Design Retrospective, observational study using electronic health records. Setting Chronic pain clinic of an academic anesthesia department. Patients All patients scheduled for evaluation or follow-up appointments in the chronic pain clinic between April 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015. Interventions Open-access scheduling was instituted in April 2015 with appointments offered on a date of the patient's choosing ≥ 1 business day after calling, with no limit on the daily number of new patients. Measurements Mean cancellation rates for new patients were compared between the 12-month baseline period prior to and for 7 months after the change, following an intervening 2-month washout period. The method of batch means (by month) and the 2-sided Student t -test were used; P 0.01 required for significance. Main results The new patient mean cancellation rate decreased from a baseline of 35.7% by 4.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4% to 6.9%; P = 0.005); however, this failed to reach the 50% reduction target of 17.8%. Appointment lag time decreased by 4.7 days (95% CI 2.3 to 7.0 days, P 0.001) from 14.1 days to 9.4 days in the new patient group. More new patients were seen within 1 week compared to baseline (50.6% versus 19.1%; P 0.0001). The mean number of new patient visits per month increased from 158.5 to 225.0 ( P = 0.0004). The cancellation rate and appointment lag times did not decrease for established patient visits, as expected because open-access scheduling was not implemented for this group. Conclusions Access to care for new chronic pain patients improved with modified open-access scheduling. However, their mean cancellation rate only decreased from 35.7% to 31.5%, making this a marginally effective strategy to reduce cancellations. Highlights ? Modified open-access scheduling was implemented for new patients at an academic chronic pain clinic. ? Appointments were offered on the date of the patient's choosing ≥ 1 business day after calling. ? The mean cancellation rate decreased from 35.7% to 31.5%, not meeting the target of a 50% reduction. ? Modified open-access scheduling was effective in increasing the number of patients seen.
机译:摘要研究目的是,确定开放式调度是否会降低慢性疼痛诊所的新患者评估的取消率,至少50%。用电子健康记录设计回顾性,观测研究。设置学术麻醉部门的慢性疼痛诊所。患者均患者于2014年4月1日和2015年12月31日期间安排在慢性疼痛诊所进行评估或后续预约。干预措施开放式调度在2015年4月在患者选择≥1的日期提供任命。召唤后的工作日,没有限制每日新患者。测量在介入2个月的洗涤期后,在发生变化后的12个月基线期间和持续7个月后的12个月基线期间,比较新患者的预取率。使用批次装置(按月份)和双面学生T -Test的方法; P& 0.01所需的意义。主要结果新的患者的平均取消率从35.7%的基线减少了4.2%(95%置信区间[CI] 1.4%至6.9%; P = 0.005);但是,这未能达到50%的减少目标为17.8%。预约滞后时间减少4.7天(95%CI 2.3至7.0天,P&LT; 0.001)在新患者组中的14.1天至9.4天。与基线相比,在1周内看到更多的新患者(50.6%与19.1%; p <0.0001)。每月的新患者的平均数量从158.5增加到225.0(p = 0.0004)。预期的既定患者访问时,取消率和预约滞后时间没有减少,因为该组未实施开放式调度。结论采用修改的开放式调度,进入新的慢性疼痛患者的护理。然而,他们的平均取消率仅从35.7%降至31.5%,这使得这是减少取消的略高有效的策略。强调 ?在学术慢性疼痛诊所的新患者实施了修改的开放式调度。还在呼叫后,患者选择≥1个工作日的约会提供约会。还平均取消率从35.7%降至31.5%,不达到50%减少目标。还改进的开放式调度在增加所看到的患者的数量方面是有效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号