首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical periodontology >Treatment of single maxillary gingival recession associated with non‐carious cervical lesion: Randomized clinical trial comparing connective tissue graft alone to graft plus partial restoration
【24h】

Treatment of single maxillary gingival recession associated with non‐carious cervical lesion: Randomized clinical trial comparing connective tissue graft alone to graft plus partial restoration

机译:与非龋齿颈椎病变相关的单个上颌牙龈衰退的治疗:随机临床试验将结缔组织移植物体单独与移植物加上部分修复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Gingival recession (GR) is frequently associated with non‐carious cervical lesion (NCCL) forming a combined defect (CD). The aim of this study was to evaluate a new multidisciplinary protocol for CDs. Methods Forty patients presenting 40 Miller's Class I or II GR defects associated with B+ tooth cervical defect were randomly allocated to one of the following treatments: test group ( n ?=?20), partial restoration (PR) of the NCCL, in which the apical border of the restoration was placed 1?mm beyond the cement–enamel junction estimation, and connective tissue graft (CTG?+?PR) and Control Group ( n ?=?20), odontoplasty of the NCCL and connective tissue graft (CTG). Clinical, aesthetic and patient‐centred outcomes were evaluated. Results After 12?months, CD coverage rates were 75.3% (2.5?±?1.0?mm) for CTG?+?PR and 74.6% (2.4?±?1.1?mm) for CTG ( p ??0.05). The estimated complete root coverage was 60% ( n ?=?12) for CTG?+?PR and 70% ( n ?=?14) for CTG. CTG?+?PR resulted in significantly better dentin hypersensitivity (DH) reduction ( p ?=?0.034). Both groups resulted in aesthetic improvements; however, the CTG?+?PR group showed better gingival contour results. Conclusions CTG and CTG?+?PR were effective to treat CD. Use of PR resulted in better gingival margin contour and DH reduction, without effect on CD coverage by CTG. (NCT02817763).
机译:摘要背景牙龈衰退(GR)经常与形成组合缺陷(CD)的非龋齿宫颈病变(NCCL)相关。本研究的目的是评估CD的新多学科议定书。方法将呈现40米的患者的40毫米患者与B +牙齿宫颈缺陷相关联的患者随机分配给下列治疗中的一种:测试组(N?=Δ2),NCCL的部分恢复(PR),其中将恢复的顶端置于粘合搪瓷结估计之外1?mm,以及结缔组织移植物(CTG?+β1)和对照组(n?=Δ2),NCCL和结缔组织移植物的渡角成形术(CTG )。评估临床,美学和患者居中的结果。结果在12?几个月后,CTG的CD覆盖率为75.3%(2.5?±1.0≤1.0毫秒),CTG为CTG和74.6%(2.4?±1.1.1Ω1.1?mm)(p?& 0.05)。 CTG的估计完全根覆盖率为60%(n?=?12),用于CTG的+ + + +ΔP和70%(n?= 14)。 ctg?+ +α_α效果明显更好的牙本质过敏(dh)减少(p?= 0.034)。两组都导致审美改善;然而,CTG?+?PR组显示出更好的牙龈轮廓结果。结论CTG和CTG?+ + PR有效治疗CD。使用PR导致更好的牙龈边缘轮廓和DH减少,没有CTG的CD覆盖率。 (NCT02817763)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号