首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Computational Chemistry: Organic, Inorganic, Physical, Biological >COMPARISON OF POTENTIAL-DERIVED CHARGE AND ATOMIC MULTIPOLE MODELS IN CALCULATING ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIALS AND ENERGIES OF SOME NUCLEIC ACID BASES AND PAIRS
【24h】

COMPARISON OF POTENTIAL-DERIVED CHARGE AND ATOMIC MULTIPOLE MODELS IN CALCULATING ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIALS AND ENERGIES OF SOME NUCLEIC ACID BASES AND PAIRS

机译:潜在衍生电荷和原子多极模型计算一些核酸碱和对的静电电位和能量的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We compare the electrostatic potential surrounding several natural and synthetic nucleic acid bases calculated using an atom-centered multiple expansion (ACME) derived from integration of the charge distribution with that from potential-derived charges (PDCs) obtained using the CHELPG procedure. When the multipole expansions are carried out to octapoles, the root mean square (rms) error in the potential is always less than that from PDCs. Electrostatic interactions in pairs of these nucleic acid bases were also evaluated using ACMEs up to octapoles and PDCs. The electrostatic interaction energies from ACMEs were found always to be larger than those from PDCs or the total self-consistent field (SCF) interaction energy. The value of the electrostatic energy differs by as much as approximately 19 or as little as approximately 8 kJ/mol between the ACME and PDC methods. The rank ordering provided by the electrostatic models is grossly similar but differs in the ranking of systems with two and three hydrogen bonds. A rigid twist about the N-H ... N axis of the pairs was examined using SCF calculations and the electrostatic models. It was found that with ACMEs the energy required for a 90-degree rotation was always higher than that found from SCF calculations. With PDCs, similar results are obtained, except with the adenine/thymine and 9-methyl-adenine/1-methyl-thymine pairs. In these instances, the barrier is about 4 kJ/mol lower than that found with SCF calculations. These results demonstrate that integration of the charge density can provide convergent multipole expansions that provide a more accurate description of the electrostatic potential than the commonly used PDC model. In addition, the description of electrostatic interactions during twisting of AT and mAmT given by this model is shown to be somewhat anomalous. (C) 1995 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [References: 41]
机译:我们将围绕使用从电荷分布的原子为中心的多膨胀(ACME)计算的几种天然和合成核酸碱基的静电电位与使用CHELPG程序获得的电源衍生电荷(PDC)的潜在衍生的电荷(PDC)进行比较。当对Octapoles执行多极扩展时,电位中的根均线(RMS)误差总是小于来自PDC的误差。还使用Acmes直到辛烷酯和PdC对这些核酸碱成对的静电相互作用。从ACMES的静电相互作用能量始终比来自PDC的静电相互作用能量或来自PDC的静电相互作用(SCF)相互作用能量。静电能量的值在ACME和PDC方法之间的约19或大约8kJ / mol的不同之处不同。静电模型提供的等级排序是严重相似的,但在具有两个和三个氢键的系统中的排名不同。使用SCF计算和静电模型检查关于对对的N-H ... N轴的刚性扭曲。发现,通过ACMES,90度旋转所需的能量总是高于SCF计算所需的能量。对于PDC,除了腺嘌呤/胸腺嘧啶和9-甲基 - 腺嘌呤/ 1-甲基 - 胸腺嘧啶对之外,获得了类似的结果。在这些情况下,屏障比SCF计算的低约4kJ / mol。这些结果表明,电荷密度的集成可以提供会聚多极扩展,其提供比常用的PDC模型的静电电位的更准确描述。另外,该模型给出的AT和MAMT扭曲期间的静电相互作用的描述被认为是稍微异常的。 (c)1995由John Wiley&Sons,Inc。[参考文献:41]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号