...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical nursing >Communication issues contributing to medication incidents: Mixed‐method analysis of hospitals’ incident reports using indicator phrases based on literature
【24h】

Communication issues contributing to medication incidents: Mixed‐method analysis of hospitals’ incident reports using indicator phrases based on literature

机译:促进药物事件的沟通问题:使用基于文学的指标短语的医院事件报告的混合方法分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Aim To identify the types and frequencies of communication issues (communication pairs, person related, institutional, structural, process and prescription‐related issues) detected in medication incident reports and to compare communication issues that caused moderate or serious harm to patients. Background Communication issues have been found to be among the main contributing factors of medication incidents, thus necessitating communication enhancement. Design A sequential exploratory mixed‐method design. Methods Medication incident reports from Finland ( n?=? 500) for the year 2015 in which communication was marked as a contributing factor were used as the data source. Indicator phrases were used for searching communication issues from free texts of incident reports. The detected issues were analysed statistically, qualitatively and considering the harm caused to the patient. Citations from free texts were extracted as evidence of issues and were classified following main categories of indicator phrases. The EQUATOR’s SRQR checklist was followed in reporting. Results Twenty‐eight communication pairs were identified, with nurse–nurse (68.2%; n ?=?341), nurse–physician (41.6%; n ?=?208) and nurse–patient (9.6%; n ?=?48) pairs being the most frequent. Communication issues existed mostly within unit (76.6%, n ?=?383). The most commonly identified issues were digital communication (68.2%; n ?=?341), lack of communication within a team (39.6%; n ?=?198), false assumptions about work processes (25.6%; n ?=?128) and being unaware of guidelines (25.0%; n ?=?125). Collegial feedback and communication from patients and relatives were the preventing issues. Moderate harm cases were often linked with lack of communication within the unit, digital communication and not following guidelines. Conclusions The interventions should be prioritised to (a) enhancing communication about work‐processes, (b) verbal communication about digital prescriptions between professionals, (c) feedback among professionals and (f) encouraging patients to communicate about medication. Relevance to clinical practice Upon identifying the most harmful and frequent communication issues, interventions to strengthen medication safety can be implemented.
机译:摘要旨在确定在药物事故报告中检测到的通信问题的类型和频率(通信对,有关,机构,结构,过程,过程,过程,过程,过程,过程,过程,过程,过程,过程,过程,过程,过程,过程,过程,过程,过程,过程,过程,过程,过程,过程,过程,过程,过程和处方和处方药和处方相关问题,对患者造成适度或严重伤害的沟通问题。背景技术已被发现是药物事故的主要贡献因素之一,因此需要进行沟通增强。设计顺序探索混合方法设计。方法对芬兰的药物入射的报告(n?=?500),其中2015年的沟通被标记为贡献因子被用作数据源。指示短语用于搜索来自事故报告的自由文本的沟通问题。检测到的问题在统计上,定性地和考虑对患者对患者造成的伤害进行分析。从自由文本的引用被提取为问题的证据,并按照主要类别的指标短语类别分类。报告中遵循赤道的SRQR清单。结果28个通信对被识别,护士护士(68.2%; n?= 341),护士医生(41.6%; n?= 208)和护士患者(9.6%; n?= 48成对是最常见的。沟通问题主要存在于单位内(76.6%,n?= 383)。最常见的问题是数字通信(68.2%; n?= 341),团队中缺乏通信(39.6%; n?= 198),关于工作过程的错误假设(25.6%; n?= 128 )并没有意识到指南(25.0%; n?= 125)。患者和亲属的学术反馈和沟通是预防问题。中等伤害案例通常与单位内的缺乏沟通,数字通信且未遵循指导方针。结论干预措施应优先于(a)加强关于工作流程的沟通,(b)关于专业人士之间的数字处方的口头沟通,(c)在专业人士和(f)中的反馈,鼓励患者沟通治疗。与临床实践的相关性在确定最有害和频繁的沟通问题时,可以实施加强药物安全的干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号