首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical neuroscience: official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia >Evaluation of Coflex interspinous stabilization following decompression compared with decompression and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease: A minimum 5-year follow-up study
【24h】

Evaluation of Coflex interspinous stabilization following decompression compared with decompression and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease: A minimum 5-year follow-up study

机译:减压后Coflex偶然稳定的评估与减压和后腰椎间融合治疗腰椎退行性疾病:最低5年的后续研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Few studies have compared the clinical and radiological outcomes between Coflex interspinous stabilization and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for degenerative lumbar disease. We compared the at least 5-year clinical and radiological outcomes of Coflex stabilization and PLIF for lumbar degenerative disease. Eighty-seven consecutive patients with lumbar degenerative disease were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-two patients underwent decompression and Coflex interspinous stabilization (Coflex group), 45 patients underwent decompression and PLIF (PLIF group). Clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated. Coflex subjects experienced less blood loss, shorter hospital stays and shorter operative time than PLIF (all p < 0.001). Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in Oswestry Disability Index and visual analogue scale back and leg pain at each follow-up time point. The Coflex group had significantly better clinical outcomes during early follow-up. At final follow-up, the superior and inferior adjacent segments motion had no significant change in the Coflex group, while the superior adjacent segment motion increased significantly in the PLIF group. At final follow-up, the operative level motion was significantly decreased in both groups, but was greater in the Coflex group. The reoperation rate for adjacent segment disease was higher in the PLIF group, but this did not achieve statistical significance (11.1% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.277). Both groups provided sustainable improved clinical outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease through at least 5-year follow-up. The Coflex group had significantly better early efficacy than the PLIF group. Coflex interspinous implantation after decompression is safe and effective for lumbar degenerative disease. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:少数研究比较了Coflex偶像稳定和后腰椎间融合(PLIF)之间的临床和放射性结果进行退行性腰椎疾病。我们将Coflex稳定化和PLIF的至少5年和腰椎退行性疾病进行了比较了至少5年的临床和放射性结果。回顾性审查了八十七名腰部退行性疾病患者。四十二名患者接受了减压和CoFlex梭菌稳定(CoFlex组),45名患者接受了减压和PLIF(PLIF组)。评估临床和放射性结果。 Coflex受试者经历了较少的血液损失,较短的医院停留并比Plif更短的操作时间(所有P <0.001)。两组均表现出在每个后续时间点的肌醇残疾指数和视觉模拟尺度的显着改善。 CoFlex组在早期后续后期临床结果明显更好。在最终随访中,CoFlex组的优越和较差的段运动在COFLEX组中没有显着变化,而在PLIF组中,优异的相邻段运动显着增加。在最终随访时,两组的手术水平运动显着降低,但在CoFlex组中更大。 PLIF组相邻分段疾病的再次速率较高,但这并未达到统计学意义(11.1%vs.4.8%,p = 0.277)。通过至少为期5年的随访,这两个团体都为腰椎退行性疾病提供了可持续改善的临床结果。 CoFlex组的早期疗效明显优于PLIF组。减压后的Coflex incerspound植入是安全有效的腰椎退行性疾病。 (c)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号