...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing >Evaluation of a non-invasive multisensor accelerometer for calculating energy expenditure in ventilated intensive care patients compared to indirect calorimetry and predictive equations
【24h】

Evaluation of a non-invasive multisensor accelerometer for calculating energy expenditure in ventilated intensive care patients compared to indirect calorimetry and predictive equations

机译:与间接量热法和预测方程相比,评估用于计算通风密集护理患者的能量消耗的非侵入式多传感器加速度计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Continuous measurement of resting energy expenditure (REE) in critically ill patients remains challenging but is required to prevent malnutrition. SenseWear Pro 3 Armband (SWA) is a research grade accelerometer for assessment of REE with the advantage of easy handling. In a prospective study we compared SWA with indirect calorimetry (IC) and predictive equations in critically ill, ventilated patients. REE was measured by SWA, IC and calculated by predictive formulas. Potential confounding factors that influence REE were also recorded. Results of SenseWear Armband and indirect calorimetry were compared using the Bland-Altman method. 34 ICU patients were investigated. SWA underestimated resting energy expenditure compared to IC with a mean bias of Delta REE = -253.6 +/- 333.2 kcal, equivalent to -11.7 % (p = 0.025). This underestimation was seen in both, medical (-14.9 %) and surgical (-12.9 %) patients and the bias was greater in patients with fever (-19.0 %), tachycardia (-18.7 %) or tachypnea (-26.2 %). Differences were also noted when SWA was compared to predictive formulas. At present, SWA cannot be regarded as an alternative to indirect calorimetry. Individual measurements are often inaccurate and should be used with caution until improved algorithms, based on the results of this study, have been implemented.
机译:持续测量休息的能源支出(REE)在重症患者中仍然挑战,但需要预防营养不良。 Sensewear Pro 3 Armband(SWA)是一种用于评估REE的研究级加速度计,具有易于处理的优势。在一项前瞻性研究中,我们将SWA与间接量热法(IC)和危重通风患者的预测方程进行了比较。 REE由SWA,IC测量并通过预测公式计算。还记录了影响REE的潜在混淆因素。使用Bland-Altman方法比较了感测臂臂和间接量热法的结果。 34 ICU患者被调查了。与IC相比,SWA低估了休息能源支出,平均偏见ΔRee= -253.6 +/- 333.2千卡,相当于-11.7%(P = 0.025)。这种低估了,医疗(-14.9%)和手术(-14.9%)和手术(-12.9%)患者,发烧患者(-19.0%),心动过速(-18.7%)或Tachypnea(-26.2%)偏差。当SWA与预测公式进行比较时,还注意到差异。目前,SWA不能被视为间接量热法的替代品。单个测量通常是不准确的,并且应该谨慎使用,直到基于本研究结果的改进算法已经实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号