首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing >Estimated continuous cardiac output based on pulse wave transit time in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison with transpulmonary thermodilution
【24h】

Estimated continuous cardiac output based on pulse wave transit time in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison with transpulmonary thermodilution

机译:基于泵浦冠状动脉旁路接枝脉冲波转运时间的估计连续心输出:与多向恒温的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To evaluate the accuracy of estimated continuous cardiac output (esCCO) based on pulse wave transit time in comparison with cardiac output (CO) assessed by transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). We calibrated the esCCO system with non-invasive (Part 1) and invasive (Part 2) blood pressure and compared with TPTD measurements. We performed parallel measurements of CO with both techniques and assessed the accuracy and precision of individual CO values and agreement of trends of changes perioperatively (Part 1) and postoperatively (Part 2). A Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias between non-invasive esCCO and TPTD of 0.9 L/min and limits of agreement of +/- 2.8 L/min. Intraoperative bias was 1.2 L/min with limits of agreement of +/- 2.9 L/min and percentage error (PE) of 64 %. Postoperatively, bias was 0.4 L/min, limits of agreement of +/- 2.3 L/min and PE of 41 %. A Bland-Altman analysis of invasive esCCO and TPTD after OPCAB found bias of 0.3 L/min with limits of agreement of +/- 2.1 L/min and PE of 40 %. A 4-quadrant plot analysis of non-invasive esCCO versus TPTD revealed overall, intraoperative and postoperative concordance rate of 76, 65, and 89 %, respectively. The analysis of trending ability of invasive esCCO after OPCAB revealed concordance rate of 73 %. During OPCAB, esCCO demonstrated poor accuracy, precision and trending ability compared to TPTD. Postoperatively, non-invasive esCCO showed better agreement with TPTD. However, invasive calibration of esCCO did not improve the accuracy and precision and the trending ability of method.
机译:根据脉冲波转运时间评估估计的连续心输出(ESCCO)的准确性与在泵浦冠状动脉旁路接枝(OPCAB)中的经母液热稀释(TPTD)评估的心输出(CO)相比。我们用非侵入性(第1部分)和侵入性(第2部分)血压并与TPTD测量相比校准了ESCCO系统。我们对两种技术进行了平行测量,并评估了个体CO值的准确性和精度,并围绕(第1部分)和术后变化趋势(第2部分)。 Bland-Altman分析显示非侵入性ESCCO和TPTD之间的偏差为0.9升/分钟,并限制+/- 2.8 L / min。术中偏置为1.2升/分钟,+/- 2.9 L / min的局限性和百分比误差(PE)为64%。术后,偏差为0.4升/分钟,+/- 2.3L / min和PE的一致性限制为41%。 OPCAB发现偏置0.3升/分钟后的侵入式ESCCO和TPTD的平坦-Altman分析,+/- 2.1 L / min和PE的局限性为40%。非侵入性Escco与TPTD的4象限绘图分析,揭示了76,65和89%的总体,术中和术后一致性率。 OPCAB后侵袭性ESCCO趋势能力分析显示,一致率为73%。在OPCAB期间,与TPTD相比,ESCCO的准确性,精度和趋势能力差。术后,非侵入性ESCCO与TPTD表现出更好的协议。然而,ESCCO的侵入性校准并未提高方法的准确性和精度和培训能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号