...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing >The value of a superior vena cava collapsibility index measured with a miniaturized transoesophageal monoplane continuous echocardiography probe to predict fluid responsiveness compared to stroke volume variations in open major vascular surgery: a prospective cohort study
【24h】

The value of a superior vena cava collapsibility index measured with a miniaturized transoesophageal monoplane continuous echocardiography probe to predict fluid responsiveness compared to stroke volume variations in open major vascular surgery: a prospective cohort study

机译:用小型化的转燕单极半球板连续超声心动图探针测量的优质腔静脉可折叠指数的值,以预测流体反应性与开放主要血管外科的中风体积变化相比:一个未来的队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Superior vena cava collapsibility index (SVC-CI) and stroke volume variation (SVV) have been shown to predict fluid responsiveness. SVC-CI has been validated only with conventional transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the SVC long axis, on the basis of SVC diameter variations, but not in the SVC short axis or by SVC area variations. SVV was not previously tested in vascular surgery patients. Forty consecutive adult patients undergoing open major vascular surgical procedures received 266 intraoperative volume loading tests (VLTs), with 500 ml of gelatine over 10 min. The hSVC-CI was measured using a miniaturized transoesophageal echocardiography probe (hTEE). The SVV and cardiac index (CI) were measured using Vigileo-FloTrac technology. VLTs were considered 'positive' (>= 11% increase in CI) or 'negative' (< 11% increase in CI). We compared SVV and hSVC-CI measurements in the SVC short axis to predict fluid responsiveness. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for hSVC-CI and SVV were not significantly different (P = 0.56), and both showed good predictivity at values of 0.92 (P < 0.001) and 0.89 (P < 0.001), respectively. The cutoff values for hSVC-CI and SVV were 37% (sensitivity 90%, specificity of 83%) and 15% (sensitivity 78%, specificity of 100%), respectively. Our study validated the value of the SVC-CI measured as area variations in the SVC short axis to predict fluid responsiveness in anesthetized patients. An hTEE probe was used to monitor and measure the hSVC-CI but conventional TEE may also offer this new dynamic parameter. In our cohort of significant preoperative hypovolemic patients undergoing major open vascular surgery, hSVC-CI and SVV cutoff values of 37% and 15%, respectively, predicted fluid responsiveness with good accuracy.
机译:已经显示出高级腔静脉塌陷指数(SVC-CI)和行程体积变化(SVV)预测流体响应性。在SVC直径变化的基础上,SVC-CI仅在SVC长轴中验证了SVC长轴中的常规转骨超声心动图(TEE),但不在SVC短轴或SVC区域变化中。 SVV先前未在血管外科患者中进行过测试。开放的四十连续成年患者接受开放的主要血管外科手术,接受了266次术中体积负载载(VLT),500ml明胶超过10分钟。使用小型化的转骨超声心动图探针(HTEE)测量HSVC-CI。使用Vigileo-Flotrac技术测量SVV和心脏指数(CI)。 VLT被认为是“阳性”(> = CI增加11%)或“负”(CI增加11%)。我们将SVV和HSVC-CI测量比较了SVC短轴以预测流体响应性。 HSVC-CI和SVV的接收器操作特性曲线下的区域没有显着差异(p = 0.56),并且两者都分别显示0.92(p <0.001)和0.89(P <0.001)的值。 HSVC-CI和SVV的截止值分别为37%(灵敏度90%,43%)和15%(灵敏度78%,特异性100%)。我们的研究验证了测量SVC短轴的区域变化的SVC-CI的值,以预测麻醉患者的流体反应性。 HTEE探测器用于监测和测量HSVC-CI,但传统的TEE也可以提供这种新的动态参数。在我们的群组中,术前术前缓解患者经历主要开放的血管外科,HSVC-CI和SVV截止值分别为37%和15%,预测流体响应性,精度良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号