首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chemical theory and computation: JCTC >Comparison of RESP and IPoIQ-Mod Partial Charges for Solvation Free Energy Calculations of Various Solute/Solvent Pairs
【24h】

Comparison of RESP and IPoIQ-Mod Partial Charges for Solvation Free Energy Calculations of Various Solute/Solvent Pairs

机译:对各种溶质/溶剂对的溶剂无能计算的REAC和IPOIQ-MOD部分电荷的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The calculation of solvation free energies Delta G(solv), by molecular simulations is of great interest as they are linked to other physical properties such as relative solubility, partition coefficient, and activity coefficient. However, shortcomings in molecular models can lead to Delta G(solv), deviations from experimental data. Various studies have demonstrated the impact of partial charges on free energy results. Consequently, calculation methods for partial charges aimed at more accurate Delta G(solv) predictions are the subject of various studies in the literature. Here we compare two methods to derive partial charges for the general AMBER force field (GAFF), i.e. the default RESP as well as the physically motivated IPolQ-Mod method that implicitly accounts for polarization costs. We study 29 solutes which include characteristic functional groups of drug-like molecules, and 12 diverse solvents were examined. In total, we consider 107 solute/solvent pairs including two water models TIP3P and TIP4P/2005. Comparison with experimental results yields better agreement for TIP3P, regardless of the partial charge scheme. The overall performance of GAFF/RESP and GAFF/IPolQ-Mod is similar, though specific shortcomings in the description of Delta G(solv) for both RESP and IPolCeMod can be identified. However, the high correlation between free energies obtained with GAFF/RESP and GAFF/IPolQ-Mod demonstrates the compatibility between the modified charges and remaining GAFF parameters.
机译:通过分子模拟的溶剂化自由能量Delta G(SOLV)的计算具有很大的兴趣,因为它们与其他物理性质(例如相对溶解度,分区系数和活性系数)相关。然而,分子模型中的缺点可以导致ΔG(SOLV),与实验数据的偏差。各种研究表明了部分收费对自由能源的影响。因此,针对更准确的Delta G(SOLV)预测的部分收费计算方法是文献中各种研究的主题。在这里,我们比较了两种方法来导出普通琥珀色字段(GAFF)的部分费用,即默认值以及隐式占偏振成本的物理激励的iPolq-mod方法。我们研究29个溶质,包括药物样分子的特征官能团,并检查12种不同的溶剂。总共考虑107个溶质/溶剂对,包括两个水模型Tip3p和Tip4p / 2005。与实验结果的比较,无论部分充电方案如何,对Tip3P的达成更好的协议。 GAFF / RESP和GAFF / iPOLQ-MOD的整体性能相似,但可以识别用于ΔG和iPolcemod的Delta G(SOLV)描述的特定缺点。然而,用GAFF / RESP和GAFF / iPOLQ-MOM获得的自由能量之间的高相关性展示了改进的电荷与剩余的GAFF参数之间的兼容性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号