...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology >Electrogram dispersion-guided driver ablation adjunctive to high-quality pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation of varying durations
【24h】

Electrogram dispersion-guided driver ablation adjunctive to high-quality pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation of varying durations

机译:电视图分散式导向驱动器消融辅助在不同持续时间的心房颤动中的高质量肺静脉分离

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective To investigate the role of driver mechanism and the effect of electrogram dispersion-guided driver mapping and ablation in atrial fibrillation (AF) at different stages of progression. Methods A total of 256 consecutive patients with AF who had undergone pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus driver ablation or conventional ablation were divided into three groups: paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF; group A, n = 51); persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF; group B, n = 38); and long standing-persistent atrial fibrillation (LS-PsAF; group C, n = 39). PVI was performed with the guidance of the ablation index. The electrogram dispersion was analyzed for driver mapping. Results The most prominent driver regions were at roof (28.0%), posterior wall (17.6%), and bottom (21.3%). From patients with PAF to those with PsAF and LS-PsAF: the complexity of extra-pulmonary vein (PV) drivers including distribution, mean number, and area of dispersion region increased (P < .001). Patients who underwent driver ablation vs conventional ablation had higher procedural AF termination rate (76.6% vs 28.1%; P < .001). With AF progression, the termination rate gradually decreased from group A to group C, and the role of PVI in AF termination was also gradually weakened from group A to group C (39.6%, 7.4%, and 4.3%; P < .001) in patients with driver ablation. At the end of the follow-up, the rate of sinus rhythm maintenance was higher in patients with driver ablation than those with conventional ablation (89.1% vs 70.3%; P < .001). Conclusion The formation of extra-PV drivers provides an important mechanism for AF maintenance with their complexity increasing with AF progression. Electrogram dispersion-guided driver ablation appears to be an efficient adjunctive approach to PVI for AF treatment.
机译:目的探讨驱动机制的作用及电池图分散引导驾驶员映射和消融在不同进展的不同阶段中的心房颤动(AF)的作用。方法使用经过肺静脉分离(PVI)加频率消融或常规消融的总共256名患有肺静脉分离(PVI)的患者分为三组:阵发性心房颤动(PAF; A组,N = 51);持续的心房颤动(PSAF; B组,N = 38);和长期持续的心房颤动(LS-PSAF; C组,N = 39)。 PVI通过烧蚀指数的指导进行。分析了电镜分散的驱动器映射。结果最突出的驾驶员区域位于屋顶(28.0%),后壁(17.6%)和底部(21.3%)。从PAF患者到具有PSAF和LS-PSAF的人:跨肺静脉(PV)驱动器的复杂性,包括分散区域的分布,平均数和面积增加(P <.001)。接受驾驶员消融vs常规消融的患者具有更高的程序AF终止率(76.6%与28.1%; p <.001)。随着AF进展,终止率从A组到C组逐渐降低,并且PVI在AF终止中的作用也从A组至C组(39.6%,7.4%和4.3%; P <.001)中逐渐减弱在驾驶员消融患者中。在随访结束时,司机烧蚀患者的鼻窦培养率高于常规消融的患者(89.1%Vs 70.3%; P <.001)。结论EXTRA-PV驾驶员的形成提供了一种重要机制,可通过自动对焦进展增加复杂性。电视图分散引导的驾驶员消融似乎是对AF治疗的PVI有效的辅助方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号