首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cancer survivorship: research and practice >Views of primary care physicians and oncologists on cancer follow-up initiatives in primary care: an online survey.
【24h】

Views of primary care physicians and oncologists on cancer follow-up initiatives in primary care: an online survey.

机译:初级保健癌症后续倡议的初级保健医生和肿瘤科学家的意见:在线调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Primary care physicians (PCPs) are playing an increasing role in the follow-up of cancer in England. In 2003 a Cancer Care Review (CCR) was introduced to ensure contact between PCPs and cancer patients within 6 months of diagnosis. The NHS also intends to introduce survivorship care plans (SCP). The aims of this study were to: describe current practice and views in primary care with respect to the CCR and information provision from secondary to primary care following final discharge from hospital follow-up; and to seek views on the perceived usefulness, content, and feasibility of a SCP. METHODS: An on-line questionnaire survey of 100 oncologists and 200 PCPs. RESULTS: Half of PCPs undertook the CCR opportunistically, and only 64% had an agreed structure. Forty percent felt the CCR was useful for the doctor, and 60% useful for the patient. Most PCPs and oncologists think a SCP would be useful, but only 40% oncologists thought that it would be easy to produce. At discharge from follow-up, more than half of oncologists said they provided information on histology, treatment, requirements for screening and surveillance, and referral guidance. Less than half provide information on potential late effects and symptoms of recurrence. PCPs felt that information on all of these areas was important and that the information they receive is often inadequate. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: The CCR has not been implemented systematically. There is support for the introduction of a SCP and broad agreement on content. However, careful planning is needed to ensure all necessary information is included and to overcome barriers of implementation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Further research should explore what cancer survivors would find useful in a primary care-based CCR and what should be included in a SCP. This should be clearly communicated to the relevant health care professionals to maximise the benefits cancer survivors and their families gain from these policy initiatives.
机译:介绍:初级保健医生(PCP)在英格兰的癌症随访中发挥着越来越大的作用。 2003年,引入了癌症护理评论(CCR),以确保在诊断的6个月内接触PCP和癌症患者。 NHS还打算介绍生存的护理计划(SCP)。本研究的目的是:描述在医院随访的最终排放后,在初级保健方面描述当前实践和初级保健的观点;并寻求对SCP的感知有用性,内容和可行性的看法。方法:100位肿瘤学家和200个PCP的在线问卷调查。结果:PCP的一半有机机会地进行了CCR,只有64%的人有一定的结构。 40%的百分之含有CCR对医生有用,60%适用于患者。大多数PCP和肿瘤科医生认为SCP是有用的,但只有40%的肿瘤科医生认为它很容易生产。在出院后,超过一半的肿瘤科医生表示,他们提供了有关组织学,治疗,筛查和监测要求的信息,以及推荐指导。不到一半提供有关潜在的晚期效应和复发症状的信息。 PCP觉得有关所有这些领域的信息很重要,并且他们收到的信息通常不足。讨论/结论:CCR尚未系统地实施。支持引入SCP和广泛的内容协议。但是,需要仔细规划以确保包括所有必要信息并克服实施的障碍。对癌症幸存者的影响:进一步的研究应该探讨癌症幸存者在初级保健的CCR中有用的是什么,以及应该包含在SCP中的内容。这应该清楚地传达给相关的医疗保健专业人员,以最大限度地提高癌症幸存者及其家庭从这些政策举措中获得的益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号