首页> 外文期刊>Journal of burn care & research: official publication of the American Burn Association >Assessment of Outreach by a Regional Burn Center: Could Referral Criteria Revision Help with Utilization of Resources?
【24h】

Assessment of Outreach by a Regional Burn Center: Could Referral Criteria Revision Help with Utilization of Resources?

机译:区域燃烧中心的外展评估:可以通过利用资源推荐标准修订帮助吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The objectives of this study were to identify trends in preburn center care, assess needs for outreach and education efforts, and evaluate resource utilization with regard to referral criteria. We hypothesized that many transferred patients were discharged home after brief hospitalizations and without need for operation. Retrospective chart review was performed for all adult and pediatric transfers to our regional burn center from July 2012 to July 2014. Details of initial management including TBSA estimation, fluid resuscitation, and intubation status were recorded. Mode of transport, burn center length of stay, need for operation, and in-hospital mortality were analyzed. In two years, our burn center received 1004 referrals from other hospitals including 713 inpatient transfers. Within this group, 621 were included in the study. Among transferred patients, 476 (77%) had burns less than 10% TBSA, 69 (11%) had burns between 10-20% TBSA, and 76 (12%) had burns greater than 20% TBSA. Referring providers did not document TBSA for 261 (42%) of patients. Among patients with less than 10% TBSA burns, 196 (41%) received fluid boluses. Among patients with TBSA 10%, 196 (41%) were sent home from the emergency department or discharged within 24 hours, and an additional 144 (30%) were discharged within 48 hours. Overall, 187 (30%) patients required an operation. In-hospital mortality rates were 1.5% for patients who arrived by ground transport, 14.9% for rotor wing transport, and 18.2% for fixed wing transport. Future education efforts should emphasize the importance of calculating TBSA to guide need for fluid resuscitation and restricting fluid boluses to patients that are hypotensive. Clarifying the American Burn Association burn center referral criteria to distinguish between immediate transfer vs outpatient referral may improve patient care and resource utilization.
机译:本研究的目标是确定预燃烧中心护理的趋势,评估外联和教育努力的需求,并评估推荐标准的资源利用。我们假设许多转移的患者在短暂住院后被排放回家,无需操作。从2012年7月至2014年7月,为所有成人和儿科转移到我们的区域烧纳中心进行了回顾性图表审查。记录了初始管理的详细信息,包括TBSA估计,流体复苏和插管状态。分析了运输方式,燃烧中心的住宿时间,需要操作,以及住院医院死亡率。在两年内,我们的烧伤中心收到了其他1004名来自其他医院的推荐,包括713个住院病的转移。在本集团中,621名纳入该研究。在转移的患者中,476(77%)烧伤小于10%TBSA,69(11%)在10-20%TBSA之间烧伤,76(12%)烧伤大于20%TBSA。参考提供商没有记录261(42%)患者的TBSA。患有少于10%TBSA烧伤的患者,196(41%)接受液体荧光液。患有TBSA患者的患者& 10%,196(41%)从急诊部门发送回家或在24小时内发出,另外144名(30%)在48小时内排出。总体而言,187名(30%)患者需要运作。地面运输抵达的患者的患者院内死亡率为1.5%,对于转子翼运输,14.9%,固定翼运输的18.2%。未来的教育努力应强调计算TBSA以指导流体复苏需求并将液体推注限制为低血压的患者的重要性。澄清美国烧毁协会烧毁中心推荐标准以区分即时转移,外科转诊可能会改善患者护理和资源利用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号